‘Where is the Christian solidarity’: Benny Wenda on PNG leader’s West Papua comments

Lydia Lewis, in Nuku’alofa, Tonga

West Papua is within the sovereignty of Indonesia, so responsibility lies with them in addressing independence demands, Papua New Guinea (PNG) Prime Minister, James Marape, says.

But the leader of the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP), Benny Wenda, told RNZ Pacific the issue was not about sovereignty.

Marape was responding to questions from PNG journalists before travelling to the 53rd Pacific Islands Forum Leaders’ Meeting (PIFLM53), which began in Tonga on Monday.

The PNG prime minister was asked whether West Papua would be openly discussed at the summit, particularly as Indonesia’s President-elect Prabowo Subianto has advocated for West Papua.

Marape said just as PNG would not want its neighbouring countries talking about sovereignty issues within its borders, Indonesia would not want its neighbours talking about West Papua and its sovereignty.

He said all other areas of its relationship with Indonesia, such as economy, will be open for discussion at the meeting.

Indonesia’s incoming president has indicated to give greater respect to indigenous views on customs, culture, and land rights and indigenous heritages should be preserved, he said.

However, Wenda told RNZ Pacific: “It’s not about sovereignty.”

“But this is about discrimination because we have been different, black Christians. That’s why Indonesia [has] committed genocide and ecocide West Papua.”

He said the indigenous West Papuans are facing the same issue as the Kanaks in New Caledonia.

“This is our sovereign state, our ancestral land, which was stolen from us, so we [have] the right to exist in our sovereign state of West Papua.”

Wenda said the people of PNG need to ask their government if they supported genocide.

“If they allow this [to] happen to their own brother, where is the Christian solidarity? Where is it?” he asked?

He said Pacific leaders have a “moral obligation” to find a solution for the indigenous Kanaks and West Papuans.

“The world is watching the Pacific leaders. What [are] the Pacific leaders going to do with two nations who are fighting the colonialism, imperialism and then ecocide, genocide or committed the illegal occupation.

“This is the Melanesian territory. This is the Pacific territory.”

He added it is important for Pacific leaders to take the make bold decisions on the issue.

Meanwhile, the Australia West Papua Association in Sydney is urging Pacific leaders attending the Tonga meeting “to continue to strongly urge Jakarta to not only allow a PIF fact-finding mission to West Papua but also to finalise the visit by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to the territory”.

In March, the Indonesian Embassy in Wellington said: “The Government of Indonesia is committed to its long-standing policy of respecting and promoting human rights as well as its strict policy of zero impunity for misconducts (sic) by security forces.”

————————————————————

Melanesian leaders want meeting with Indonesian president on West Papua ‘as soon as practicable’

Lydia Lewis, in Nuku’alofa, Tonga lydia.lewis@rnz.co.nz 

The Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) wants to have a meeting with Indonesia’s incoming President Prabowo Subianto to address ongoing human rights concerns in West Papua.

It comes after Fiji and Papua New Guinea’s prime ministers – Sitiveni Rabuka and James Marape – failed to organise a visit after being appointed special envoys on West Papua, at last year’s Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders meeting.

Marape told RNZ Pacific: “We could not find a time where both of us got to Indonesia.”

The MSG met on the sidelines of the 53rd Pacific Islands Leaders’ Summit in Nuku’alofa on Tuesday.

Vanuatu’s Prime Minister and the sub-regional bloc’s chair, Charlot Salwai, said there has been concerns surrounding West Papua for some time.

“Some issues in relations to human rights…because the [Pacific Islands] Forum back in 2019 decided to ask [for a] UN mission to do fact-finding mission in Indonesia.”

The United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) president, Benny Wenda, said: “It is time for PIF to reaffirm their 2019 call for a UN High Commissioner for Human Rights visit to West Papua.

“It has now been five years since PIF’s initial demand for a UN visit was made, and over 110 countries have echoed this Pacific call,” he posted on X.

Salwai said it would be good to have a face-to-face meeting with Subianto.

The MSG leaders released a statement on Tuesday, stating: “The welfare of the interests of our Melanesians in West Papua and the other Papuan Provinces in Indonesia is an ongoing concern to our peoples.”

“In this regard, the MSG Leaders Dialogue with the President of Indonesia is a project of great importance that must be pursued.

“The [MSG] Secretariat must maintain contact with the relevant Indonesian authorities to ensure that opportunities are identified for all MSG Leaders to meet with the Indonesian President as soon as practicable.”

The group will have a Special Leaders’ Summit on 14 and 15 November in Fiji.

From Papua to Gaza, military occupation leads to ‘ecocide’ – climate catastrophe 

By APR editor –  August 14, 2024 0 7 

Environmental destruction is not an unintended side effect, but a primary objective in colonial wars of occupation.

By David Whyte and Samira Homerang Saunders

Many in the international community are finally coming to accept that the earth’s ecosystem can no longer bear the weight of military occupation.

Most have reached this inevitable conclusion, clearly articulated in the environmental movement’s latest slogan “No Climate Justice on Occupied Land”, in light of the horrors we have witnessed in Gaza since October 7.

While the correlation between military occupation and climate sustainability may be a recent discovery for those living their lives in relative peace and security, people living under occupation, and thus constant threat of military violence, have always known any guided missile strike or aerial bombardment campaign by an occupying military is not only an attack on those being targeted but also their land’s ability to sustain life.

A recent hearing on “State and Environmental Violence in West Papua” under the jurisdiction of the Rome-based Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal (PPT), for example, heard that Indonesia’s military occupation, spanning more than seven decades, has facilitated a “slow genocide” of the Papuan people through not only political repression and violence, but also the gradual decimation of the forest area — one of the largest and most biodiverse on the planet — that sustains them.

West Papua hosts one of the largest copper and gold mines in the world, is the site of a major BP liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility, and is the fastest-expanding area of palm oil and biofuel plantation in Indonesia.

All of these industries leave ecological dead zones in their wake, and every single one of them is secured by military occupation.

At the PPT hearing, prominent Papuan lawyer Yan Christian Warinussy spoke of the connection between human suffering in West Papua and the exploitation of the region’s natural resources.

Shot and wounded
Just one week later, he was shot and wounded by an unknown assailant. The PPT Secretariat noted that the attack came after the lawyer depicted “the past and current violence committed against the defenceless civil population and the environment in the region”.

What happened to Warinussy reinforced yet again the indivisibility of military occupation and environmental violence.

In total, militaries around the world account for almost 5.5 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions annually — more than the aviation and shipping industries combined.

Our colleagues at Queen Mary University of London recently concluded that emissions from the first 120 days of this latest round of slaughter in Gaza alone were greater than the annual emissions of 26 individual countries; emissions from rebuilding Gaza will be higher than the annual emissions of more than 135 countries, equating them to those of Sweden and Portugal.

But even these shocking statistics fail to shed sufficient light on the deep connection between military violence and environmental violence. War and occupation’s impact on the climate is not merely a side effect or unfortunate consequence.

We must not reduce our analysis of what is going on in Gaza, for example, to a dualism of consequences: the killing of people on one side and the effect on “the environment” on the other.

Inseparable from impact on nature
In reality, the impact on the people is inseparable from the impact on nature. The genocide in Gaza is also an ecocide — as is almost always the case with military campaigns.

In the Vietnam War, the use of toxic chemicals, including Agent Orange, was part of a deliberate strategy to eliminate any capacity for agricultural production, and thus force the people off their land and into “strategic hamlets”.

Forests, used by the Vietcong as cover, were also cut by the US military to reduce the population’s capacity for resistance. The anti-war activist and international lawyer Richard Falk coined the phrase “ecocide” to describe this.

In different ways, this is what all military operations do: they tactically reduce or completely eliminate the capacity of the “enemy” population to live sustainably and to retain autonomy over its own water and food supplies.

Since 2014, the bulldozing of Palestinian homes and other essential infrastructure by the Israeli occupation forces has been complemented by chemical warfare, with herbicides aerially sprayed by the Israeli military destroying entire swaths of arable land in Gaza.

In other words, Gaza has been subjected to an “ecocide” strategy almost identical to the one used in Vietnam since long before October 7.

The occupying military force has been working to reduce, and eventually completely eliminate, the Palestinian population’s capacity to live sustainably in Gaza for many years. Since October 7, it has been waging a war to make Gaza completely unliveable.

50% of Gaza farms wiped out
As researchers at Forensic Architecture have concluded, at least 50 percent of farmland and orchards in Gaza are now completely wiped out. Many ancient olive groves have also been destroyed. Fields of crops have been uprooted using tanks, tractors and other vehicles.

Widespread aerial bombardment reduced the Gaza Strip’s greenhouse production facilities to rubble. All this was done not by mistake, but in a deliberate effort to leave the land unable to sustain life.

The wholesale destruction of the water supply and sanitation facilities and the ongoing threat of starvation across the Gaza Strip are also not unwanted consequences, but deliberate tactics of war. The Israeli military has weaponised food and water access in its unrelenting assault on the population of Gaza.

Of course, none of this is new to Palestinians there, or indeed in the West Bank. Israel has been using these same tactics to sustain its occupation, pressure Palestinians into leaving their lands, and expand its illegal settlement enterprise for many years.

Since October 7, it has merely intensified its efforts. It is now working with unprecedented urgency to eradicate the little capacity the occupied Palestinian territory has left in it to sustain Palestinian life.

Just as is the case with the occupation of Papua, environmental destruction is not an unintended side effect but a primary objective of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. The immediate damage military occupation inflicts on the affected population is never separate from the long-term damage it inflicts on the planet.

For this reason, it would be a mistake to try and separate the genocide from the ecocide in Gaza, or anywhere else for that matter.

Anyone interested in putting an end to human suffering now, and preventing climate catastrophe in the future, should oppose all wars of occupation, and all forms of militarism that help fuel them.

David Whyte is professor of climate justice at Queen Mary University of London and director of the Centre for Climate Crime and Climate Justice. Samira Homerang Saunders is research officer at the Centre for Climate Crime and Climate Justice, Queen Mary University.

Flight services in Mulia suspended in wake of unrest: police  

Several police and military vehicles were torched by rioters in Mulia, Puncak Jaya district, Central Papua, on Wednesday (July 17, 2024). (ANTARA/HO/Dokumentasi)
 

Jayapura, Papua (ANTARA) – The deadly violence that broke out in Mulia, the capital of Puncak Jaya district, Central Papua, on Wednesday forced the temporary suspension of civilian flights to and from the town, a local police officer said.

The flight services will remain suspended until further notice, the chief of Puncak Jaya Police, Adjunct Sen Coms Kuswara, told ANTARA during a telephonic conversation from Jayapura, the capital of Papua province, on Thursday.

Currently, the overall situation in Mulia is relatively conducive, but police personnel are continuing to exercise vigilance as many residents are still afraid of resuming outdoor and economic activities, he informed.

“We hope that the security situation will fully be conducive soon so that the flight service can be resumed, and locals’ activities can get back to normal,” he said.

To help restore law and order, the Papua police deployed joint personnel from the Mobile Brigade (Brimob) unit and Operation Peace Cartenz Task Force to Mulia.

They arrived on Thursday and joined their counterparts from the Puncak Jaya police station to commence efforts to restore law and order in the town.

The unrest on Wednesday broke out following the deaths of three insurgents belonging to the Teranus Enumbi-led armed group operating in Karubate village, Muara sub-district, Puncak Jaya district, on Tuesday (July 16, 2024).

The rebels, identified as SW (33), YW (41), and DW (36), died in a gunfight with the RK 753/AVR Infantry Battalion Task Force personnel, according to the XVII Cenderawasih Regional Military Command.

The ensuing violence left one resident dead and four others injured, according to Kuswara.

Abdulah Jaelani (30) died after sustaining injuries from a sharp weapon, he said adding that the injured were identified as Novald Dermawan, Arief, Safrudin, and Bude Nina.

They sustained injuries after rioters resorted to stone pelting and launched attacks with arrows and sharp weapons. The rioters also torched several vehicles parked near Mulia Public Hospital.

Over the past few years, armed groups have often employed hit-and-run tactics against Indonesian security personnel and mounted acts of terror against civilians in the districts of Intan Jaya, Nduga, and Puncak to incite fear among the people.

The targets of such acts of terror have included construction workers, motorcycle taxi (ojek) drivers, teachers, students, street food vendors, and even, civilian aircraft.

Indonesia-Pacific Parliamentary Forum Discusses Climate Change, Papua: House Speaker  

Translator Najla Nur Fauziyah 

Editor Laila Afifa 

26 July 2024 09:10 WIB

TEMPO.COJakarta – Indonesian House of Representatives Speaker Puan Maharani closed the Indonesia-Pacific Parliamentary Partnership (IPPP) forum on Thursday, July 25, 2024. According to Puan, the forum discussed various issues from climate change to Papua.

Puan said that IPPP is a forum initiated by the Indonesian House of Representatives. “The Indonesian House of Representatives initiated this meeting because it considered that cooperation with Pacific countries would be geopolitically essential,” said Puan on Thursday.

Puan said several countries in the Pacific region attended the meeting, including Cook Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, Kiribati, the Republic of Fiji, and Indonesia. In addition, the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG) organization was also present.

Regarding climate issues, Puan said the IPPP forum resulted in a joint commitment to work together to tackle the impacts of climate change.  

Meanwhile, the issue of Papua was discussed in the MSG-Indonesia meeting held on the sidelines of the IPPP. The meeting was attended by delegates from Fiji, Solomon, Papua New Guinea, and MSG representatives. 

“We relayed the information about our brothers and sisters in Papua, about how there are four provinces in Papua now, and about what Indonesia has done in regards to Papua,” said Puan.  

The IPPP Forum also discussed marine potential in the Pacific region, specifically on economic development which resulted in the agreement to advance multilateral agreements between Pacific countries.

Puan said that the IPPP Forum also produced several recommendations. “Among them is the mutual respect related to the principle of equal respect for sovereignty and territorial unity and how we maintain peace among the Pacific region,” she said.

In addition, Puan said that the Indonesian House of Representatives has committed to helping Pacific countries, especially in carrying out parliamentary functions and producing synergy between parliament and government.

Previously, the IPPP Forum was opened by President Joko Widodo or Jokowi on Thursday morning, July 25, 2024. Jokowi appreciated the partnership between the Indonesian House of Representatives and the parliaments of Pacific countries as a strategic initiative to strengthen partnerships in the Pacific region.

SULTAN ABDURRAHMAN

-ABC Pacific

1) MSG Director-General under fire for West Papua comments

Broadcast Thu 25 Jul 2024 at 6:00am

Audiohttps://www.abc.net.au/pacific/programs/pacificbeat/msgwestpapua/104139636?utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&fbclid=IwY2xjawEQ5TtleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHdv4DuFiv2PjKKemLd6O4bpC-CxGV8lgWjzL0XKKZ6btHmU0OyWMQS1udA_aem_CeTIQzOJOx9yzCUJVEx5hA

Play   Duration: 4 minutes 55 seconds

There has been a backlash against the Director-General of the Melanesian Spearhead Group, Leonard Louma, after Indonesian media reports emerged of him saying the situation in West Papua was “stable and conducive” during a visit to the territory last month.

The visit, which was unannounced, has been criticised for lack of transparency.

“Melanesian countries want to see how the MSG is dealing with the human rights issue in West Papua so they need to be transparent in any of the trips made to that place,” said the President of the Vanuatu Free West Papua Association, Lai Sakita.

“The population of West Papua are Melanesian … and the entity called the MSG should be working for this population not for people who are outside.”

Credits

Leah Lowonbu, Reporter Image Details Leonard Louma(Melanesian Spearhead Group——————————

When will we treat Indonesia seriously? 

By Duncan Graham Jul 24, 2024

Guarantee: This report is free of US political toxins. The contents are purely local.

The title question deserves a cynic’s response: Only when the country next door becomes a military dictatorship and mates with China. Then we might wake up.

Indonesia is seventy times bigger than Bali where most Australians get their experience of beach-and-Bintangs, probably imagining the other 37 provinces are much the same. They’re not.

If the political scientists’ ‘arc of instability’ ever spanned the region, Indonesia isn’t there now.

The world’s fourth largest nation with an impressive 5.3 per cent growth rate, has become an aid donor and is dashing towards superpower status. It’s not within coo-ee of struggling Pacific Island states crying for aid and getting attention in spades by playing footsie with the PRC.

Here’s proof we’re not serious: A decade ago the then Coalition Government paraded its New Colombo Plan – a “signature initiative” whatever that means.

The idea was to “lift knowledge of the Indo-Pacific …by supporting Australian undergraduates to undertake study, language training and internships in the region.” Applause all round.

The name has a history: In 1951 a multi-state meeting in the Sri Lankan capital set up the show to help “developing countries”. We offered scholarships for Southeast Asians to study in Australia. More claps.

Some of Indonesia’s future leaders got to know Down Under and build lasting mateships. That generation has largely passed. The CP is now involved in drug use reduction, gender affairs and climate change.

The NCP reverses the original intent and looks fine till the data is analysed. Students can go to any one of the 40 countries in the scheme. So far 12,000 Aussies have visited Indonesia across three decades, mostly for short courses.

But how to find a uni, a visa and help when all turns turtle? Students can go it alone, but it’s easier using ACICIS, the Australian Consortium for In-Country Studies. It was an idea of now-retired Professor David Hill of Perth’s Murdoch University.

This year the agency celebrates its 30th birthday and reports some achievements.

More than 4,000 alumni are working in key areas of government, here and overseas. In 2012 the now largely forgotten Australia in the Asian Century White Paper described the consortium as a “successful model for in-country learning”.

Last year Hill was given an Indonesian award for “promoting collaboration … and the Indonesian language.”

Despite the persistence of Hill and others, Canberra prefers to focus on the Pacific, particularly islands where Beijing has been poking around for niches to embed.

We wear our monolingualism with pride. That’s gross; the Jakarta Post has told its readers what sort of neighbours they’re lumbered with by reporting: “Australian students participating in Indonesian-language programs has hit a historic low …this trend could have an adverse effect on the broader bilateral ties.”

Ten Indonesian unis are involved with ACICIS. Students keen to better understand our regional mates – as all governments urge but rarely facilitate – have access to 25 courses. They span from law to farming – plus the essentials – language and culture.

Every student backpacker is a de-facto diplomat showing through their involvement and enthusiasm that Aussies aren’t all Kuta hoons – or in the posse of America’s Deputy Sheriff, as John Howard once reportedly positioned his nation.

But here’s the issue: The ACICIS report reveals that last year it “assisted 436 Australian and international students to undertake study in Indonesia.”

Good on ya – except that Indonesian Government figures show the Republic has more than 4,000 “institutes of higher learning”. Though only 184 are public they cater for 3.38 million students.

Many private unis are small and run by religious organisations and corporates. Quality is mixed and offerings are limited. They have around 4.5 million enrollees.

The top campus is the public Universitas Indonesia. Internationally it ranks badly at 206, even lower on some assessment sites.

Overseas study enthusiasts prefer China; Indonesia is seventh on the choice scale, just ahead of South Korea – although in second place (after Japan) in the Indo-Pacific.

A Lowy Institute report claimed “Indonesia’s education system has been a high-volume, low-quality enterprise that has fallen well short of the country’s ambitions for an ‘internationally competitive’ system.”

That was written in 2018. There’s been some movement though little evidence of major reform in the past six years. Jakarta also has to stir the possum if it wants its unis to draw foreigners.

As Indonesia has eleven citizens for every Aussie we need at least 4,500 students exploring the archipelago every year, not for quickies but long term. Even then we’d only be a spit on the surface.

However the number sent through ACICIS is roughly the same as in 2018.

Juggling figures like this is a clumsy exercise taking no account of dropouts, course changes, policy shifts, definitions and other factors like Covid – but it hammers the nail that we’re just not dinkum about the nation next door.

Next year a semester in Indonesia is likely to cost a student in fees, fares, insurance and living costs up to $16,000, though this can be offset by NCP support.

Adaptive frugals can get by on less (and learn more) if they live like locals.

ACICIS gets 2.53 per cent of the NCP’s mobility funding (mainly short courses) and is paying scholarships for long-term students. There are 120 competitive NCP scholarships for top students nominated by their campus.

That’s for any one of 40 countries.

ACICIS director Liam Prince said “the key blockages are in the lack of clear, curriculum-embedded pathways to a semester in the Indo-Pacific by the Australian universities.

“Through size, proximity and geopolitical significance, Australia must have a constructive, mutually beneficial relationship.

“Australia’s side is in trying to see the world from an Indonesian perspective; it’s one of the necessary conditions for fulfilling the potential of the bilateral relationship.”

Former PM Paul Keating said: “We find our security in Asia, we find it by being useful in the Asian community, we find it by building coalitions and this is an imperative.”

It’s an idea still to be bought by the electorate. Otherwise it would demand the federal government gets earnest about urging unis to prioritise Asian skills.

Not everyone wants to do a PhD in Old Javanese but at all levels the curious and talented will want a taste of the New Indonesia. They need encouragement – for all our sakes now and in the years ahead.

 Duncan Graham 

 Duncan Graham has been a journalist for more than 40 years in print, radio and TV. He is the author of People Next Door (UWA Press). He is now writing for the English language media in Indonesia from within Indonesia.

Duncan Graham has an MPhil degree, a Walkley Award, two Human Rights Commission awards and other prizes for his radio, TV and print journalism in Australia. He lives in East Java.

-First Published in John Mendaue’s Pearls and Irritants ————————————

Papua’s Awyu, Moi Sigin Tribes Deliver Petition of Support to Top Court over Customary Land Grabs 

 

Translator Najla Nur Fauziyah 

Editor Petir Garda Bhwana 

23 July 2024 08:41 WIB

TEMPO.COJakarta – Representatives of the Awyu and Moi Sigin indigenous communities submitted a petition supporting the tribes’ struggle against palm oil companies to the Supreme Court on Monday, July 22, 2024, from South Papua and Southwest Papua. 

Their visit to the Supreme Court was also intended to question the progress of the Awyu and Moi Sigin tribes’ cassation filed respectively on Mack and early May.

“To this day, we have not received any information about the registration number of the cassation appeal that we, Awyu and Moi Sigin indigenous communities, submitted to the Supreme Court,” said the representative of the Awyu tribe, Hendrikus Woro in a written statement on Monday.

“We came all the way from Papua twice because we were waiting for a decision that would save our customary forests,” said Hendrikus.

Hendrikus Woro’s petition concerns the environmental permit issued by the Papua Provincial Government to PT Indo Asiana Lestari (IAL) for 36,094 hectares of the Woro clan’s customary forest. 

Apart from PT IAL, several members of the Awyu Indigenous communities are also filing an appeal against PT Kartika Cipta Pratama and PT Megakarya Jaya Raya for 65,415 hectares of rainforest.

In a separate case, the Moi Sigin sub-tribe is fighting against PT Sorong Agro Sawitindo (SAS) as the defendant intervenor. PT SAS sued the central government for revoking their permit on 18,160 hectares of customary forest. 

“We received 253,823 signatures in the petition supporting the Awyu and Moi tribes, which today will be submitted directly to the Supreme Court. This petition and the recent #AllEyesOnPapua movement are proof of many people’s concern for the tribes’ struggle,” said a member of the  Save Papua Forests’ Advocacy Team from the Bentala People’s Heritage Foundation, Tigor Hutapea, on Monday.

Member of the Save Papua Forests’ Advocacy Team from Greenpeace Indonesia, Sekar Banjaran Aji, said customary forests are an ancestral heritage that has supported the Awyu and Moi Sigin indigenous communities for generations. They depend on forests as hunting grounds and ‘supermarkets’ for various sources of food and medicine. Forests are also indigenous people’s culture and identity.

Sekar emphasized that saving Papua’s forests will not only strengthen the defense against the climate crisis and biodiversity extinction but also protect natural, social, and cultural wealth.

Moi Sigin indigenous woman, Diana Klafiyu, also expressed her appreciation for the support that has poured in for their struggle and those signing the petition. 

“I hope that the judge will decide in favor of us, the indigenous people of the Moi tribe and the Awyu tribe,” Diana said.

ANNISA FEBIOLA

—————————

Latest Puncak Jaya massacre reveals West Papua ‘is a time bomb’, claims Benny Wenda 

By APR editor –  July 20, 2024

Asia Pacific Report

A brutal killing of three Papuan civilians in Puncak Jaya reveals that occupied West Papua is a ticking time bomb under Indonesian President-elect Prabowo Subianto, claims the leader of an advocacy group.

And United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) Benny Wenda says the Melanesian region risks becoming “another East Timor”.

The victims have been named as Tonda Wanimbo, 33; Dominus Enumbi, and Murib Government.

Their killings were followed by riots in Puncak Jaya as angry indigenous residents protested in front of the local police station and set fire to police cars, said Wenda in a statement.

“This incident is merely the most recent example of Indonesia’s military and business strategy in West Papua,” he said.

“Indonesia deliberately creates escalations to justify deploying more troops, particularly in mineral-rich areas, causing our people to scatter and allowing international corporations to exploit the empty land – starting the cycle of bloodshed all over again.”

According to the ULMWP, 4500 Indonesian troops have recently been deployed to Paniai, one of the centres of West Papuan resistance.

An estimated 100,000 West Papuans have been displaced since 2018, while recent figures show more than 76,000 Papuans remain internally displaced — “living as refugees in the bush”.

Indonesia ‘wants our land’
“Indonesia wants our land and our resources, not our people,” Wenda said.

The Indonesian military claimed that the three men were members of the resistance movement TPNPB (West Papua National Liberation Army), but this has been denied.

Military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Candra Kurniawan claimed one of the men had been sought by security forces for six years for alleged shootings of civilians and security personnel.

“This is the same lie they told about Enius Tabuni and the five Papuan teenagers murdered in Yahukimo in September 2023,” Wenda said.

“The military line was quickly refuted by a community leader in Puncak Jaya, who clarified that the three men were all civilians.”

Concern over Warinussy
Wenda said he was also “profoundly concerned” over the shooting of lawyer and human rights defender Christian Warinussy.

Warinussy has spent his career defending indigenous Papuans who have expelled from their ancestral land to make way for oil palm plantations and industrial mines.

“Although we don’t know who shot him, his shooting acts as a clear warning to any Papuans who stand up for their customary land rights or investigates Indonesia’s crimes,” Wenda said.

Indonesia’s latest violence is taking place “in the shadow of Prabowo Subianto”, who is due to take office as President on October 20.

Prabowo has been widely accused over human rights abuses during his period in Timor-Leste.

“Will he form militias to crush the West Papua liberation movement, as he previously did in East Timor?” asked Wenda.

Minister for agriculture gaoled for 10 years on charges of corruption

Jakarta anti-graft court on Thursday sentenced a former agriculture minister to 10 years in prison for extortion and misuse of public funds, raising questions again about outgoing President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s commitment to fight corruption.

Syahrul Yasin Limpo, 69, became the sixth cabinet minister in Jokowi’s two presidential terms to be embroiled in corruption allegations.

Presiding Judge Rianto Adam Pontoh said Syahrul had extorted more than 44 billion rupiah (U.S. $2.75 million) between 2020 and 2023, using the money to buy cars and jewelry, to pay for beauty treatments and family parties or to provide gifts to others.

“The defendant Syahrul Yasin Limpo has been proven legally and convincingly, according to the law, guilty of committing the crime of corruption jointly and continuously,” Rianto ruled.

Court documents said the ex-minister threatened to dismiss his subordinates if they refused to comply with his demand for 20% of the ministry’s budgeted funds, which he used for personal, family and colleagues’ interests.

The judge said the ex-minister had extorted the money through two of his subordinates, Kasdi Subagyono, his secretary general; and Muhammad Hatta, director of the Agricultural Equipment and Machinery directorate. The judge sentenced them to four years each, as well.

While prosecutors had requested a 12-year prison term, the judge issued a more lenient sentence, noting that Syahrul returned some of the money. He also noted the former minister had made a positive contribution in handling the national food crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

11 ID-minister2.jpegFormer cabinet minister Syahrul Yasin Limpo (left) looks at supporters during his sentencing in a Jakarta courtroom, July 11, 2024. [Eko Siswono Toyudho/BenarNews]

Syahrul’s lawyer Djamaludidin Koedoeboen said his client had not decided if he would appeal the ruling. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) had named Syahrul as an extortion suspect on Oct. 11, 2023.

After the sentencing, Syahrul apologized to his family, the community and his colleagues in the NasDem Party.

At the start of Syahrul’s trial in February, prosecutor Taufiq Ibnugroho said the former minister appointed trusted people to collect money from his subordinates.

When presenting his case on July 5, Syahrul tearfully claimed to not be very wealthy.

“I am one of the poorest ministers,” he said.

Syahrul’s assets total about 20 billion rupiah (U.S. $1.24 million), according to the government’s state officials wealth report (LHKPN).

Indonesia Corruption Watch researcher Kurnia Ramadhana said he hoped the KPK would continue to develop the case against Syahrul by summoning his family.

“The KPK needs to conduct further investigations. The witness’s statement in the trial that said Syahrul’s family also enjoyed the proceeds of corruption must be taken seriously,” Kurnia told BenarNews.

The case took a bizarre turn in November 2023 when the then-KPK chief,  Firli Bahuri, was suspended – and then fired a month later – after being suspected of demanding bribes from Syahrul in exchange for leniency in the graft case against him.

Firli, a former police general, has also been named a suspect in an extortion case by the Jakarta police.

International tribunal demands end to Indonesia’s ‘cold genocide’ in West Papua  

The “Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on State and Environmental Violence in West Papua” took place last month at Queen Mary University of London.

A panel of tribunal experts heard evidence from numerous international NGOs and local civil society organisations as well as testimonies from individuals who have witnessed human rights violations and environmental destruction.

The Tribunal stated that the Indonesian state has forcibly taken Indigenous Papuan lands through racial discrimination, leading to cultural loss and violent repression, including unlawful detention, extrajudicial killings, displacement, and environmental degradation. It urged the international community, particularly the UN, to respond urgently to the situation in Papua.

The Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal (PPT) is a public opinion tribunal based on the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Peoples (Algiers, 1976) and on all the instruments of  international law; the various chapters of the PPT have sought to struggle against impunity and to promote respect for human rights, access to justice and the re-appropriation of the human rights instruments; the PPT is able to adjudicate flagrant, systemic and systematic violations of the rights  of peoples;

It combined legal scholars, right-defending NGOs, and West Papuans in exile, with eye-witnesses from West Papua connecting via online calls. These tribunals examine international law, but cannot enforce their judgement. The Indonesian state is accused of the following, 

The Indonesian state is accused of taking the ancestral land of the Indigenous Papuan people against their will, employing racial discrimination which leads to the loss of culture, traditions and Indigenous knowledge, erases their history and subsumes them into the Indonesian national narrative. 

The Indonesian state is accused of violent repression, including unlawful detention, extra-judicial killing, and population displacement in West Papua as a means of furthering industrial development.

The Indonesian state is accused of organised environmental degradation, including the destruction of eco-systems, contamination of land, the poisoning of rivers and their tributaries and of providing the permits, concessions and legal structure of non-compliance for national and foreign companies to invest in West Papua in a way that encourages environmental degradation.

The Indonesian state is accused of colluding with national and foreign companies to cause environmental degradation, population displacement and sustain violent repression in West Papua.

The panel of experts comprised of Teresa Almeida Cravo (Portugal), Donna Andrews (South Africa), Daniel Feierstein (Argentina), Marina Forti (Italy), Larry Lohmann (UK), Nello Rossi (Italy), and Solomon Yeo (Solomon Islands), according to the website of Queen Mary University of London

The territory of West Papua refers to the Western half of the island of New Guinea, partitioned as a result of European colonial settlement. West Papuans, an Indigenous Melanesian people, have been engaged in a struggle for their right to self-determination since colonisation by the Netherlands in 1898.

Responding to the final statement of the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on Papua in London, Amnesty International Indonesia’s executive director Usman Hamid said:

“The final statement truly mirrors the deteriorating developments in Papua. Their historic findings signal the depth of human rights violations and environmental destruction in the region.

“The tribunal is a great start to paving the way to justice in Papua and we hope that it serves as an opportunity for the international community to stand in solidarity with the people of Papua, to acknowledge their suffering and to support their fight for human rights.

“The Indonesian authorities have continuously failed to end the conflict that keeps claiming more civilian lives in the region. It is therefore essential for authorities to evaluate its military operations and business activities by corporate actors to ensure the recovery and the protection of human rights in Papua.

“This arduous path of justice for Papuans must end. It is high time for the international community to call on the Indonesian authorities to end the long-established violence.”