When will we treat Indonesia seriously? 

By Duncan Graham Jul 24, 2024

Guarantee: This report is free of US political toxins. The contents are purely local.

The title question deserves a cynic’s response: Only when the country next door becomes a military dictatorship and mates with China. Then we might wake up.

Indonesia is seventy times bigger than Bali where most Australians get their experience of beach-and-Bintangs, probably imagining the other 37 provinces are much the same. They’re not.

If the political scientists’ ‘arc of instability’ ever spanned the region, Indonesia isn’t there now.

The world’s fourth largest nation with an impressive 5.3 per cent growth rate, has become an aid donor and is dashing towards superpower status. It’s not within coo-ee of struggling Pacific Island states crying for aid and getting attention in spades by playing footsie with the PRC.

Here’s proof we’re not serious: A decade ago the then Coalition Government paraded its New Colombo Plan – a “signature initiative” whatever that means.

The idea was to “lift knowledge of the Indo-Pacific …by supporting Australian undergraduates to undertake study, language training and internships in the region.” Applause all round.

The name has a history: In 1951 a multi-state meeting in the Sri Lankan capital set up the show to help “developing countries”. We offered scholarships for Southeast Asians to study in Australia. More claps.

Some of Indonesia’s future leaders got to know Down Under and build lasting mateships. That generation has largely passed. The CP is now involved in drug use reduction, gender affairs and climate change.

The NCP reverses the original intent and looks fine till the data is analysed. Students can go to any one of the 40 countries in the scheme. So far 12,000 Aussies have visited Indonesia across three decades, mostly for short courses.

But how to find a uni, a visa and help when all turns turtle? Students can go it alone, but it’s easier using ACICIS, the Australian Consortium for In-Country Studies. It was an idea of now-retired Professor David Hill of Perth’s Murdoch University.

This year the agency celebrates its 30th birthday and reports some achievements.

More than 4,000 alumni are working in key areas of government, here and overseas. In 2012 the now largely forgotten Australia in the Asian Century White Paper described the consortium as a “successful model for in-country learning”.

Last year Hill was given an Indonesian award for “promoting collaboration … and the Indonesian language.”

Despite the persistence of Hill and others, Canberra prefers to focus on the Pacific, particularly islands where Beijing has been poking around for niches to embed.

We wear our monolingualism with pride. That’s gross; the Jakarta Post has told its readers what sort of neighbours they’re lumbered with by reporting: “Australian students participating in Indonesian-language programs has hit a historic low …this trend could have an adverse effect on the broader bilateral ties.”

Ten Indonesian unis are involved with ACICIS. Students keen to better understand our regional mates – as all governments urge but rarely facilitate – have access to 25 courses. They span from law to farming – plus the essentials – language and culture.

Every student backpacker is a de-facto diplomat showing through their involvement and enthusiasm that Aussies aren’t all Kuta hoons – or in the posse of America’s Deputy Sheriff, as John Howard once reportedly positioned his nation.

But here’s the issue: The ACICIS report reveals that last year it “assisted 436 Australian and international students to undertake study in Indonesia.”

Good on ya – except that Indonesian Government figures show the Republic has more than 4,000 “institutes of higher learning”. Though only 184 are public they cater for 3.38 million students.

Many private unis are small and run by religious organisations and corporates. Quality is mixed and offerings are limited. They have around 4.5 million enrollees.

The top campus is the public Universitas Indonesia. Internationally it ranks badly at 206, even lower on some assessment sites.

Overseas study enthusiasts prefer China; Indonesia is seventh on the choice scale, just ahead of South Korea – although in second place (after Japan) in the Indo-Pacific.

A Lowy Institute report claimed “Indonesia’s education system has been a high-volume, low-quality enterprise that has fallen well short of the country’s ambitions for an ‘internationally competitive’ system.”

That was written in 2018. There’s been some movement though little evidence of major reform in the past six years. Jakarta also has to stir the possum if it wants its unis to draw foreigners.

As Indonesia has eleven citizens for every Aussie we need at least 4,500 students exploring the archipelago every year, not for quickies but long term. Even then we’d only be a spit on the surface.

However the number sent through ACICIS is roughly the same as in 2018.

Juggling figures like this is a clumsy exercise taking no account of dropouts, course changes, policy shifts, definitions and other factors like Covid – but it hammers the nail that we’re just not dinkum about the nation next door.

Next year a semester in Indonesia is likely to cost a student in fees, fares, insurance and living costs up to $16,000, though this can be offset by NCP support.

Adaptive frugals can get by on less (and learn more) if they live like locals.

ACICIS gets 2.53 per cent of the NCP’s mobility funding (mainly short courses) and is paying scholarships for long-term students. There are 120 competitive NCP scholarships for top students nominated by their campus.

That’s for any one of 40 countries.

ACICIS director Liam Prince said “the key blockages are in the lack of clear, curriculum-embedded pathways to a semester in the Indo-Pacific by the Australian universities.

“Through size, proximity and geopolitical significance, Australia must have a constructive, mutually beneficial relationship.

“Australia’s side is in trying to see the world from an Indonesian perspective; it’s one of the necessary conditions for fulfilling the potential of the bilateral relationship.”

Former PM Paul Keating said: “We find our security in Asia, we find it by being useful in the Asian community, we find it by building coalitions and this is an imperative.”

It’s an idea still to be bought by the electorate. Otherwise it would demand the federal government gets earnest about urging unis to prioritise Asian skills.

Not everyone wants to do a PhD in Old Javanese but at all levels the curious and talented will want a taste of the New Indonesia. They need encouragement – for all our sakes now and in the years ahead.

 Duncan Graham 

 Duncan Graham has been a journalist for more than 40 years in print, radio and TV. He is the author of People Next Door (UWA Press). He is now writing for the English language media in Indonesia from within Indonesia.

Duncan Graham has an MPhil degree, a Walkley Award, two Human Rights Commission awards and other prizes for his radio, TV and print journalism in Australia. He lives in East Java.

-First Published in John Mendaue’s Pearls and Irritants ————————————

Papua’s Awyu, Moi Sigin Tribes Deliver Petition of Support to Top Court over Customary Land Grabs 

 

Translator Najla Nur Fauziyah 

Editor Petir Garda Bhwana 

23 July 2024 08:41 WIB

TEMPO.COJakarta – Representatives of the Awyu and Moi Sigin indigenous communities submitted a petition supporting the tribes’ struggle against palm oil companies to the Supreme Court on Monday, July 22, 2024, from South Papua and Southwest Papua. 

Their visit to the Supreme Court was also intended to question the progress of the Awyu and Moi Sigin tribes’ cassation filed respectively on Mack and early May.

“To this day, we have not received any information about the registration number of the cassation appeal that we, Awyu and Moi Sigin indigenous communities, submitted to the Supreme Court,” said the representative of the Awyu tribe, Hendrikus Woro in a written statement on Monday.

“We came all the way from Papua twice because we were waiting for a decision that would save our customary forests,” said Hendrikus.

Hendrikus Woro’s petition concerns the environmental permit issued by the Papua Provincial Government to PT Indo Asiana Lestari (IAL) for 36,094 hectares of the Woro clan’s customary forest. 

Apart from PT IAL, several members of the Awyu Indigenous communities are also filing an appeal against PT Kartika Cipta Pratama and PT Megakarya Jaya Raya for 65,415 hectares of rainforest.

In a separate case, the Moi Sigin sub-tribe is fighting against PT Sorong Agro Sawitindo (SAS) as the defendant intervenor. PT SAS sued the central government for revoking their permit on 18,160 hectares of customary forest. 

“We received 253,823 signatures in the petition supporting the Awyu and Moi tribes, which today will be submitted directly to the Supreme Court. This petition and the recent #AllEyesOnPapua movement are proof of many people’s concern for the tribes’ struggle,” said a member of the  Save Papua Forests’ Advocacy Team from the Bentala People’s Heritage Foundation, Tigor Hutapea, on Monday.

Member of the Save Papua Forests’ Advocacy Team from Greenpeace Indonesia, Sekar Banjaran Aji, said customary forests are an ancestral heritage that has supported the Awyu and Moi Sigin indigenous communities for generations. They depend on forests as hunting grounds and ‘supermarkets’ for various sources of food and medicine. Forests are also indigenous people’s culture and identity.

Sekar emphasized that saving Papua’s forests will not only strengthen the defense against the climate crisis and biodiversity extinction but also protect natural, social, and cultural wealth.

Moi Sigin indigenous woman, Diana Klafiyu, also expressed her appreciation for the support that has poured in for their struggle and those signing the petition. 

“I hope that the judge will decide in favor of us, the indigenous people of the Moi tribe and the Awyu tribe,” Diana said.

ANNISA FEBIOLA

—————————

Latest Puncak Jaya massacre reveals West Papua ‘is a time bomb’, claims Benny Wenda 

By APR editor –  July 20, 2024

Asia Pacific Report

A brutal killing of three Papuan civilians in Puncak Jaya reveals that occupied West Papua is a ticking time bomb under Indonesian President-elect Prabowo Subianto, claims the leader of an advocacy group.

And United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) Benny Wenda says the Melanesian region risks becoming “another East Timor”.

The victims have been named as Tonda Wanimbo, 33; Dominus Enumbi, and Murib Government.

Their killings were followed by riots in Puncak Jaya as angry indigenous residents protested in front of the local police station and set fire to police cars, said Wenda in a statement.

“This incident is merely the most recent example of Indonesia’s military and business strategy in West Papua,” he said.

“Indonesia deliberately creates escalations to justify deploying more troops, particularly in mineral-rich areas, causing our people to scatter and allowing international corporations to exploit the empty land – starting the cycle of bloodshed all over again.”

According to the ULMWP, 4500 Indonesian troops have recently been deployed to Paniai, one of the centres of West Papuan resistance.

An estimated 100,000 West Papuans have been displaced since 2018, while recent figures show more than 76,000 Papuans remain internally displaced — “living as refugees in the bush”.

Indonesia ‘wants our land’
“Indonesia wants our land and our resources, not our people,” Wenda said.

The Indonesian military claimed that the three men were members of the resistance movement TPNPB (West Papua National Liberation Army), but this has been denied.

Military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Candra Kurniawan claimed one of the men had been sought by security forces for six years for alleged shootings of civilians and security personnel.

“This is the same lie they told about Enius Tabuni and the five Papuan teenagers murdered in Yahukimo in September 2023,” Wenda said.

“The military line was quickly refuted by a community leader in Puncak Jaya, who clarified that the three men were all civilians.”

Concern over Warinussy
Wenda said he was also “profoundly concerned” over the shooting of lawyer and human rights defender Christian Warinussy.

Warinussy has spent his career defending indigenous Papuans who have expelled from their ancestral land to make way for oil palm plantations and industrial mines.

“Although we don’t know who shot him, his shooting acts as a clear warning to any Papuans who stand up for their customary land rights or investigates Indonesia’s crimes,” Wenda said.

Indonesia’s latest violence is taking place “in the shadow of Prabowo Subianto”, who is due to take office as President on October 20.

Prabowo has been widely accused over human rights abuses during his period in Timor-Leste.

“Will he form militias to crush the West Papua liberation movement, as he previously did in East Timor?” asked Wenda.

Minister for agriculture gaoled for 10 years on charges of corruption

Jakarta anti-graft court on Thursday sentenced a former agriculture minister to 10 years in prison for extortion and misuse of public funds, raising questions again about outgoing President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s commitment to fight corruption.

Syahrul Yasin Limpo, 69, became the sixth cabinet minister in Jokowi’s two presidential terms to be embroiled in corruption allegations.

Presiding Judge Rianto Adam Pontoh said Syahrul had extorted more than 44 billion rupiah (U.S. $2.75 million) between 2020 and 2023, using the money to buy cars and jewelry, to pay for beauty treatments and family parties or to provide gifts to others.

“The defendant Syahrul Yasin Limpo has been proven legally and convincingly, according to the law, guilty of committing the crime of corruption jointly and continuously,” Rianto ruled.

Court documents said the ex-minister threatened to dismiss his subordinates if they refused to comply with his demand for 20% of the ministry’s budgeted funds, which he used for personal, family and colleagues’ interests.

The judge said the ex-minister had extorted the money through two of his subordinates, Kasdi Subagyono, his secretary general; and Muhammad Hatta, director of the Agricultural Equipment and Machinery directorate. The judge sentenced them to four years each, as well.

While prosecutors had requested a 12-year prison term, the judge issued a more lenient sentence, noting that Syahrul returned some of the money. He also noted the former minister had made a positive contribution in handling the national food crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

11 ID-minister2.jpegFormer cabinet minister Syahrul Yasin Limpo (left) looks at supporters during his sentencing in a Jakarta courtroom, July 11, 2024. [Eko Siswono Toyudho/BenarNews]

Syahrul’s lawyer Djamaludidin Koedoeboen said his client had not decided if he would appeal the ruling. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) had named Syahrul as an extortion suspect on Oct. 11, 2023.

After the sentencing, Syahrul apologized to his family, the community and his colleagues in the NasDem Party.

At the start of Syahrul’s trial in February, prosecutor Taufiq Ibnugroho said the former minister appointed trusted people to collect money from his subordinates.

When presenting his case on July 5, Syahrul tearfully claimed to not be very wealthy.

“I am one of the poorest ministers,” he said.

Syahrul’s assets total about 20 billion rupiah (U.S. $1.24 million), according to the government’s state officials wealth report (LHKPN).

Indonesia Corruption Watch researcher Kurnia Ramadhana said he hoped the KPK would continue to develop the case against Syahrul by summoning his family.

“The KPK needs to conduct further investigations. The witness’s statement in the trial that said Syahrul’s family also enjoyed the proceeds of corruption must be taken seriously,” Kurnia told BenarNews.

The case took a bizarre turn in November 2023 when the then-KPK chief,  Firli Bahuri, was suspended – and then fired a month later – after being suspected of demanding bribes from Syahrul in exchange for leniency in the graft case against him.

Firli, a former police general, has also been named a suspect in an extortion case by the Jakarta police.

International tribunal demands end to Indonesia’s ‘cold genocide’ in West Papua  

The “Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on State and Environmental Violence in West Papua” took place last month at Queen Mary University of London.

A panel of tribunal experts heard evidence from numerous international NGOs and local civil society organisations as well as testimonies from individuals who have witnessed human rights violations and environmental destruction.

The Tribunal stated that the Indonesian state has forcibly taken Indigenous Papuan lands through racial discrimination, leading to cultural loss and violent repression, including unlawful detention, extrajudicial killings, displacement, and environmental degradation. It urged the international community, particularly the UN, to respond urgently to the situation in Papua.

The Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal (PPT) is a public opinion tribunal based on the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Peoples (Algiers, 1976) and on all the instruments of  international law; the various chapters of the PPT have sought to struggle against impunity and to promote respect for human rights, access to justice and the re-appropriation of the human rights instruments; the PPT is able to adjudicate flagrant, systemic and systematic violations of the rights  of peoples;

It combined legal scholars, right-defending NGOs, and West Papuans in exile, with eye-witnesses from West Papua connecting via online calls. These tribunals examine international law, but cannot enforce their judgement. The Indonesian state is accused of the following, 

The Indonesian state is accused of taking the ancestral land of the Indigenous Papuan people against their will, employing racial discrimination which leads to the loss of culture, traditions and Indigenous knowledge, erases their history and subsumes them into the Indonesian national narrative. 

The Indonesian state is accused of violent repression, including unlawful detention, extra-judicial killing, and population displacement in West Papua as a means of furthering industrial development.

The Indonesian state is accused of organised environmental degradation, including the destruction of eco-systems, contamination of land, the poisoning of rivers and their tributaries and of providing the permits, concessions and legal structure of non-compliance for national and foreign companies to invest in West Papua in a way that encourages environmental degradation.

The Indonesian state is accused of colluding with national and foreign companies to cause environmental degradation, population displacement and sustain violent repression in West Papua.

The panel of experts comprised of Teresa Almeida Cravo (Portugal), Donna Andrews (South Africa), Daniel Feierstein (Argentina), Marina Forti (Italy), Larry Lohmann (UK), Nello Rossi (Italy), and Solomon Yeo (Solomon Islands), according to the website of Queen Mary University of London

The territory of West Papua refers to the Western half of the island of New Guinea, partitioned as a result of European colonial settlement. West Papuans, an Indigenous Melanesian people, have been engaged in a struggle for their right to self-determination since colonisation by the Netherlands in 1898.

Responding to the final statement of the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on Papua in London, Amnesty International Indonesia’s executive director Usman Hamid said:

“The final statement truly mirrors the deteriorating developments in Papua. Their historic findings signal the depth of human rights violations and environmental destruction in the region.

“The tribunal is a great start to paving the way to justice in Papua and we hope that it serves as an opportunity for the international community to stand in solidarity with the people of Papua, to acknowledge their suffering and to support their fight for human rights.

“The Indonesian authorities have continuously failed to end the conflict that keeps claiming more civilian lives in the region. It is therefore essential for authorities to evaluate its military operations and business activities by corporate actors to ensure the recovery and the protection of human rights in Papua.

“This arduous path of justice for Papuans must end. It is high time for the international community to call on the Indonesian authorities to end the long-established violence.”

Court rejects Papua journalist Victor Mambor’s appeal over bomb attack

Jubi Papua – July 9, 2024

Jayapura – Zakarias Talaty, the sole judge at the Jayapura District Court, has rejected a pretrial motion on behalf of senior Papuan journalist Victor Mambor against an Order to Stop Investigation (SP3) issued by the North Jayapura Sectoral Police (Polsek) on the grounds that the SP3 was legitimate due to the lack of witnesses who saw the bomb attack on Mambor’s home in March 2023.

Papua Human Rights Lawyers Association (PAHAM Papua) Director Gustaf R. Kawer said that the Papua Regional Police should take the Molotov bomb terror attack seriously by involving the Detachment 88 counter-terrorism unit.

“Not ‘trivialising’ it by allowing the investigators at the Polsek level to handle such a serious case, because the quality of investigators and the minimal equipment has an impacted on the conclusion that there was a lack of witnesses who saw the incident”, Kawer said as quoted in a press release received by Jubi on Tuesday July 9.

Kawer said that the bomb attack against Victor Mambor is a serious matter, because it is categorised as a special criminal offense regulated under the Anti-Terrorism Law and the Law on Firearms and Ammunition Owners.

“The police must take it seriously, because it involves the safety of people and the general public”, he said.

The lack of seriousness by the police in handling the case through to the issuance of the SP3, he continued, was repeated by Judge Talapatty in rejecting the pretrial motion without considering the documentary evidence and witnesses that were presented by the plaintiff.

Under the criminal law process, the party authorised to conduct investigations and criminal investigations, to find evidence in a crime is the police, who are given a mandate under the Police Law and the Criminal Procedural Code (KUHAP), not the victim or person who reports a crime, the victim’s family or third parties such as non-government organisations (NGOs).

“It’s very strange if the burden of proof is placed on the victim or reporter [of the crime]”, said Kawer.

According to Kawer, the pretrial ruling will clearly set a bad precedent for solving cases of terror against journalists, never mind with a Molotov bomb attack which had a serious impact on the victim and the general public.

The attack was carried out in the city of Jayapura, an area which in terms of uncovering the case should be very easy to do if the police work “supernaturally”.

“This case is certainly a mystery for senior journalists Victor Mambor who is the victim and the general public, how are these cases going to be uncovered if the police and judges treat it as ‘trivial’? The general public and press people, of course need police and judges ‘who work supernaturally’ so that in the future terror bombs like this can be uncovered”, he said.

Related

[Translated by James Balowski. Abridged slightly due to repetition. The original title of the article was “Praperadilan SP3 Ditolak, PAHAM Papua: Ini Perkara Serius”.]

Source: https://jubi.id/rilis-pers/2024/praperadilan-sp3-ditolak-paham-papua-ini-perkara-serius/

Papua asks seven districts to carry out open defecation-free program  

June 23, 2024 21:03 GMT+700

Jayapura, Papua (ANTARA) – The Government of Papua Province asked seven districts in the province to immediately implement the open defecation free program to reach the target of 100 percent elimination by the end of 2024.

“The seven districts are Jayapura, Keerom, Sarmi, Waropen, Yapen Islands, Mamberamo Raya, and Supiori,” Papua Governor’s Expert Staff for Community and Human Development Daniel R Senis said here on Sunday.

According to him, the only regions in Papua that have reached 100 percent elimination of open defecation are Biak Numfor District and Jayapura City.

Related news: BKKBN attributes stunting prevalence to living environment quality

“Open defecation cannot be taken lightly because it is a serious problem that has a detrimental impact on the environment, and has the potential to transmit disease germs such as diarrhea, typhoid, dysentery, and cholera,” he said.

He explained that children who frequently have those diseases will have their growth and development disrupted and ultimately this can result in stunting and even death.

“For that reason, we are encouraging the seven districts to immediately reach the target of 100 percent open defecation elimination in villages because this is in line with the mandate of sustainable development goals,” Senis said.

Meanwhile, UNICEF Indonesia’s Chief Field Office of Papua Aminuddin Ramdan stated that his office will continue to support the government in promoting the importance of good sanitation in villages to handle stunting.

Stunting reduction is a priority program of the Indonesian government, which is seeking to bring down stunting prevalence to 14 percent this year.

“Sanitation also has many relations with other diseases such as polio, whose transmission occurs through feces,” he said.

He noted that based on data, there are 500 villages in Papua that are not yet free from open defecation.

Related news: Mayors should use CSR funds for MCKs: Jakarta acting governor

Translator: Qadri Pratiwi, Raka Adji
Editor: Rahmad Nasution

From social media to the Supreme Court: The battle to save Papua’s forests

The recent slogan “All Eyes on Papua” emerged in response to the viral “All Eyes on Rafah” campaign on Instagram. Indigenous communities and the youth in Papua hope that this movement will foster real solidarity with Papuan issues. The first post, shared more than three million times, called for support for the Awyu people in Boven Digoel, who are battling deforestation caused by the palm oil company PT Indo Asiana Lestari.

The fight for customary land

The Awyu tribe is striving to protect 36,094 hectares of customary land from palm oil expansion. The campaign, initially focused on agrarian conflicts, has now broadened to address issues such as education, health, hunger, and armed conflicts in Papua. These issues have led to numerous deaths and displacements over the decades.Hendrikus Franky Woro, a representative of the Awyu Tribe, has become a central figure in this movement, despite not using social media. He recently expressed gratitude for the support from netizens and emphasized the tribe’s reliance on the Supreme Court to fairly resolve their lawsuit against PT Indo Asiana Lestari.

Broader socio-political issues

The campaign gained traction after the Awyu representatives held a protest in front of the Supreme Court office in Jakarta on 27 May 2024. They performed traditional dances and chants, displaying posters with messages like “Save Papua’s Customary Forests” and “Papua is Not Empty Land.”The “All Eyes on Papua” slogan went viral shortly after this protest. The campaign was bolstered by public figures, including Indonesian national footballer Sandy Walsh, and it drew significant attention to the extensive deforestation in Papua, documented by Yayasan Pusaka Bentala Rakyat. This deforestation, notably in Boven Digoel, threatens the livelihoods and heritage of indigenous communities.The movement has highlighted not only environmental but also socio-political issues in Papua. Campaigners, such as Greenpeace’s Sekar Banjaran Aji, stress the importance of public support in pressuring the Supreme Court to protect the forests. The campaign also seeks to raise awareness about the broader challenges faced by indigenous Papuans, including economic, health, and human rights issues.

Government response and criticism

The Indonesian government has responded with mixed signals. Presidential special staff Billy Mambrasar claimed to have recommended a review of the company permits to President Joko Widodo. However, this claim was questioned by researchers and activists who pointed out the government’s historical neglect of indigenous rights and environmental concerns.The United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) criticised the Indonesian government for ignoring long-standing conflicts and human rights abuses in Papua while condemning international conflicts like those in Palestine. They argue that the Indonesian government’s approach has resulted in slow-motion genocide, ethnocide, and ecocide in Papua.

The legal battle continues

The legal battle for the Awyu and Moi tribes continues, with hopes pinned on the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision. Despite setbacks in lower courts, the tribes remain determined to defend their customary lands. Their struggle represents not only a fight for environmental justice but also a broader call for recognition and protection of indigenous rights in Indonesia.The “All Eyes on Papua” campaign serves as a powerful reminder of the ongoing struggles in Papua and the urgent need for solidarity and action to protect the region’s people and environment. The movement urges the public to educate themselves about Papuan issues and support the indigenous communities’ efforts to secure their rights and heritage.

Papua’s Customary Forests Are Threatened with Disappearance by the Expansion of the Palm Oil Industry

All Eyes On Papua, the solidarity movement to save customary forests in Cenderawasih continues to resonate  

byRedaksi Asiatoday

June 3, 2024

in SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT

Reading Time: 3 mins read

ASIATODAY.ID, JAKARTA – The social media scene in Indonesia in the last few days has been filled with uploads of posters reading “All Eyes on Papua”.  This poster has been widely uploaded by residents as a form of support for the Papuan indigenous people, especially the Awyu and Moi tribes who are struggling to defend their customary forests.

This is because the customary forest, which has been a source of livelihood for the Awyu tribe in Boven Digoel, South Papua, and the Moi tribe in Sorong, West Papua, is at risk of being lost due to the expansion of the palm oil industry which is clearing land in Bumi Cenderawasih.

The “All Eyes on Papua” campaign has increasingly come into the public spotlight and gained momentum after environmental fighters from the Awyu and Moi tribes staged a protest at the Supreme Court, Jakarta, on Monday, May 27 2024.

Based on official information from the Coalition to Save Papua Customary Forests published on the official Greenpeace Indonesia website, the Awyu tribe and Moi tribe communities are both involved in legal action against the local government and palm oil companies to defend their customary forests. Both lawsuits have now reached the cassation stage at the Supreme Court.

An environmental fighter from the Awyu tribe, Hendrikus Woro, sued the Papua Provincial Government for issuing an environmental feasibility permit for PT IAL.

PT IAL has an environmental permit covering an area of ​​36,094 hectares, or more than half the area of ​​Jakarta City, and is located in the traditional forest of the Woro clan – part of the Awyu tribe.

However, Hendrikus’ lawsuit failed in the first and second instance courts. Now, the cassation at the Supreme Court is his remaining hope to defend the customary forest which has been his ancestral heritage and support the Woro clan for generations.

Apart from the PT IAL case’s cassation, a number of Awyu indigenous communities are also filing an cassation against the lawsuit of PT Kartika Cipta Pratama and PT Megakarya Jaya Raya, two palm oil companies which have also expanded and will expand in Boven Digoel. PT KCP and PT MJR, which previously lost at the Jakarta PTUN, filed an appeal and were won by a judge at the Jakarta State Administrative High Court (PTUN).

“We have been tormented for quite a long time by the existence of palm oil plans in our traditional territory. We want to raise our children through natural products. Palm oil will destroy our forests, we reject it,” said Rikarda Maa, an Awyu traditional woman.

The Moi Sigin sub-tribe is fighting against PT SAS which will clear 18,160 hectares of Moi Sigin customary forest for oil palm plantations. PT SAS previously held a concession of 40 thousand hectares in Sorong Regency.

In 2022, the central government will revoke PT SAS’s forest area release permit, followed by the revocation of business permits. Not accepting this decision, PT SAS sued the government at the Jakarta PTUN.

Representatives of the Moi Sigin indigenous community also fought back by submitting themselves as intervention defendants at the Jakarta PTUN in December 2023. After the judge rejected the lawsuit in early January, the Moi Sigin indigenous community filed an appeal to the Supreme Court on May 3 2024.

“I urge the Supreme Court to provide legal justice for us indigenous peoples. The customary forest is where we hunt and gather sago. The forest is a pharmacy for us. Our needs are all in the forest. If our traditional forests disappear, where else will we go?” said Fiktor Klafiu, a representative of the Moi Sigin indigenous community who was the defendant in the intervention.

According to the Coalition to Save Papuan Traditional Forests, the existence of oil palm plantations is said to destroy forests which are a source of livelihood, food, water, medicine, culture and knowledge for the Awyu and Moi indigenous communities. This forest is also a habitat for endemic Papuan flora and fauna, as well as storing large carbon reserves.

It is feared that palm oil plantation operations will trigger deforestation which will release 25 million tonnes of CO2e into the atmosphere, exacerbating the impact of the climate crisis in the country.

“The panel of judges needs to prioritize aspects of environmental and climate justice, the impacts of which will not only be felt by the Awyu and Moi tribes but also other Indonesian people,” said Tigor Hutapea, a member of the legal team for the Awyu and Moi tribes from Pusaka Bentala Rakyat.

Greenpeace Indonesia Forest Campaigner, Sekar Banjaran Aji, said that the struggle of the Awyu and Moi tribes was an honorable effort for the sake of customary forests, for the lives of their children and grandchildren today and in the future, and indirectly all of us.

“We invite the public to support the struggle of the Awyu and Moi tribes and speak out about saving Papua’s forests which are our stronghold in facing the climate crisis.” (AT Network)

Follow Us at Google News and WA Channel

AWPA condemns latest military operation in West Papua. Over 5000 villagers flee

AWPA condemns the latest Indonesian security force operation in in the Bibida District, Paniai Regency which has resulted in more than 5,000 people  from 15 villages in Bibida and Paniai  fleeing their villages.

Joe Collins of AWPA said, “this number is added to the already large number of IDPs in the highlands who have fled their villages in the past few years because of the ongoing conflict ” .

Human Rights Monitor (HRM) in its June update reported that there are “over 76,919 people in West Papua, mainly  indigenous Papuans, who remain internally displaced due to the armed conflict in the region.   https://humanrightsmonitor.org/news/idp-update-june-2024-urgent-call-for-humanitarian-access-to-conflict-areas/

Suara Papua media  reported (15 June) that Kugapa and Ugidimi villages in Bibida district, Paniai regency were  reported to be empty  since Friday afternoon (14/6/2024) as residents had fled to other places that are considered safe. https://suarapapua.com/2024/06/15/warga-bibida-mengungsi-ke-pastoran-madi-pemuda-katolik-desak-penanganan-cepat/#google_vignette

According to a HRM report only elderly people who could no longer walk and sick people remained in the villages. 

 A number of villagers fled in fear  to  the Madi Holy Cross Parish Church because the security forces were pursuing  a TPNPB OPM group after  a taxi driver was killed by the TPNPB according to the military on the Enarotali-Bibida road, in Kopo village.  

HRM report from   information received from local sources, that the “security forces entered the Bibida District with ten trucks around 8.00 am and began searching houses. The operation was accompanied by four helicopters circulating over Bibida. One of them reportedly released multiple shootings during the raid causing thousands of people from the villages Bibida, Dama-Dama, Kolaitaka, Kugaisiga, Odiyai, Tuwakotu, and Ugidimi to flee their homes. In the Paniai Timur Districts, people from the villages Amougi, Timida, Kopo, Wouye Butu, Uwibutu, Madi, Ipakiye, and Pugotadi (see table below). https://humanrightsmonitor.org/news/security-force-operation-in-districts-bibida-and-paniai-timur-more-than-5000-indigenous-moni-and-me-people-flee-their-homes/

Joe Collins said, “it’s a pity that the only mainstream media reports on the Indonesian security force operations are those in the Indonesian media with the usual statements from military spokespersons such as 

“The TNI personnel continue to restore security, law and order in Bibida following their success in reclaiming the sub-district area from the Undius Kogoya-led insurgents on Friday, June 14”,

“The success of TNI soldiers in shooting two OPM people has reduced the strength of the OPM, which, of course, has a positive impact on maintaining security and stability for the smooth process of accelerating development in Papua,” Lt. Gen. Richard Tampubolon remarked.

And in an  Antara News report,  Armed Papuan rebels use civilians as human shields: TNI officer. https://en.antaranews.com/news/316266/armed-papuan-rebels-use-civilians-as-human-shields-tni-officer

Collins said “statements so similar to military statements in other conflicts  that there must be a conflict 101 lesson for military spokespersons”.

Local organisations such as the Catholic Youth have asked for the important role of the Paniai district government to quickly resolve the situation in Bibida so that a peaceful atmosphere can be restored, so that residents can return to their hometowns.

Hopefully, the Australian Government will also urge the Indonesian Government to stop using a military approach to every incident in Papua as all it does is increase  the loss of life and create even more internal refugees”.

Ends.

Photos below from Suara Papua report