Blood, silence and history: questioning Indonesia’s 1965 narrative

Duncan Graham

 December 11, 2025 

As Indonesia prepares to release a new official national history, an Australian historian’s account of the 1965–66 mass killings threatens to reopen a long-suppressed debate about power, violence, and memory.Indonesia’s reputation for tolerance is about to be tested by an Australian academic. Queensland historian Greg Poulgrain says he isn’t seeking fame or notoriety, just “telling the truth”, but fears his name will be trashed and research shredded. That’s if the Indonesian government responds furiously to a foreigner challenging the official account of frenzied killings as “one of the darkest turning points in Indonesia’s modern history.”

The Indonesian government-approved version of the past six decades has a surprise Moscow-engineered Communist plot to take over the Republic. This was thwarted by the military and courageous General Soeharto, who was then rewarded with the presidency, a position he held for 32 years.

The US Central Intelligence Agency claimed: “The (1965-66 anti-Communist) massacres in Indonesia rank as one of the worst mass murders of the 20th century.”

In 1966, Australian PM Harold Holt callously quipped: “With 500,000 to one million Communist sympathisers knocked off, I think it’s safe to say a reorientation has taken place.”

This month Jakarta plans to launch a new official history of the world’s fourth largest nation by population (285 million) with 88 per cent Sunni Muslims.

US and UK-educated former journalist Fadli Zon is Indonesia’s Minister for Culture. He’s ordered the writing of his nation’s history in ten volumes by more than a hundred academics pounding laptops. The section dealing with the 1965 crisis should be on the streets before 2025 departs.

Also to be released this month by Kompas, the nation’s premier publisher, is Poulgrain’s Blood and Silence – the Hidden Tragedy 1965.

His account has the plot known ahead of time by Soeharto, who launched the genocide backed by Washington. He’s just been awarded National Hero status by his former son-in-law, current President Prabowo Subianto.

Nations tack together myths about themselves that become so embedded they morph into truths and resist scrutiny.

Ours is that we’re tough Ozzies, big on mateship and giving all a go, sturdy upholders of the Anzac spirit, larrikins who value independence.

Indonesia’s pride is a nation of friendly folk, humble and helpful, accepting those who follow different gods, values and opinions.

That’s the opposite of the ghastly reality that still stains memories and stirs fears of a repeat in the land next door, once red with the blood of executions. This writer has been shown bunkers on riverbanks, allegedly mass graves from the 60s, undisturbed lest they release vengeful ghosts.

The excuse for the slaughter is that the wee folk were impetuously aroused to slitting neighbours’ and relatives’ throats because the godless Communists were about to overthrow the government and ban Islam. They didn’t need encouragement.

Poulgrain’s account doesn’t follow that script. He has US capitalists and right-wing politicians in cahoots with Muslim big business, determined to rip out the land rights movement rooted in Marxism, not through legislation and debate but violence.

During his 20-year reign, founding President Soekarno had grown close to the Partai Komunis Indonesia and away from the West and foreign corporations. His home-grown ideology was Nasakom, a contrived blend of nationalism, Islam and Communism. No reference to the military.

Nasakom remained illusory,” writes Poulgrain. “Soekarno’s political opponents took every opportunity to label him as a Communist, though (President) John Kennedy knew this was untrue.

“This worried the PKI’s fierce rivals, the Indonesian Army, whose power waned as the PKI grew.”

The story of Asia’s largest genocide is one that few Australians know and many Indonesians don’t want told. On the last day of September 1965, Indonesians woke to news that six generals had been seized from their homes by soldiers, shot, and their bodies dumped in a well at an air force base after being castrated and their eyes gouged by naked dancing women.

This was an embellishment to pique outrage – autopsies found no traces of torture and mutilation. Nor were there any nudies.

The killers were alleged to be Communists, and the mastermind was supposed to be Moscow. Russia and China were rivals seeking the support of the Partai Komunis Indonesia, then the world’s largest Communist party outside the Sino-Soviet Bloc.

That afternoon, the public was reassured by radio that the government of the first President Soekarno was intact, though the military was in charge through a ‘Revolutionary Council’.

This was led by General Soeharto, who later became the second president and held his job for 32 years. During this time, he and his family allegedly amassed US $35 billion of public money through widespread corruption.

In 1965, he ordered the nation cleansed of the ungodly PKI, so the military broke out its armouries for the killing squads. Modern weapons weren’t always necessary, as scythes and other farm tools were used to murder villagers the Army had labelled Reds. They helpfully distributed lists of those doomed to die.

Poulgrain quotes a distressed Soekarno saying: “Those people instigating the anti-PKI massacres, namely, the Army and the CIA, ought to be brought to trial.” That didn’t happen. Soekarno’s power was waning, and Soeharto’s narrative of a spontaneous and unstoppable grass-roots uprising prevailed.

Poulgrain’s research has Soeharto well prepared ahead of the coup. “At no time during his two decades in the military (prior to 1965) did Soeharto acquire a reputation of being anti-PKI … (he was) more concerned with business than politics.”

Poulgrain claims the unarmed Communists allegedly threatening the State were in reality “landless rice-farmers (petani) whose very existence depended on getting some land to grow rice. They comprised the bulk of PKI membership … supporting legal land reform in the hope of securing a small patch to grow their own food.

“On the other side were Muslim landlords for whom land reform was seen as a threat to their livelihood, wealth and status, their very existence.

“Most petani had no land at all … 60 to 70 per cent were pursuing subsistence-based agriculture.”

Sixty years on, land reform and inequality remain weeping wounds. In the 2024 presidential election campaign, The Jakarta Post commented: “Economic inequality, notably in income and wealth ownership, should have been discussed vigorously because of its connection to economic instability and political unrest.

“(There’s a) correlation between economic inequality and slow economic income disparity; last year was the worst in the last five years … remaining among the highest in Asia.”

If this gulf isn’t bridged, sociologists fear another volcano of violence could erupt.

G30S remains a compulsory annual national holiday with all flags at half-mast, including those on residents’ gates.

There are sickening dioramas in a special Jakarta museum celebrating the horrors, influencing school kids on compulsory visits. There’s a huge statue of the six murdered generals looking formidable. Doubts voiced by outsiders get ridiculed with the easy slur that critics are Fellow Travellers.

Poulgrain’s 122-page book is based on years of research and interviews held with key participants in Indonesia and overseas for his PhD in the last century, when many witnesses were alive. He writes:

“Australia’s biggest contribution to the Army’s anti-communist campaign was broadcasting and supporting Indonesian Army propaganda.

“The Army seized control of virtually all of Indonesia’s media after the attempted coup. It began an aggressive and pervasive anti-PKI campaign, spreading dangerous disinformation to discredit and dehumanise the Communists.  The party and its principles are still banned.

“Radio Australia fed the Indonesian population an Indonesian Army-approved political narrative that Ambassador Mick Shann said ‘should [be thumped] into Indonesians’ as much as possible.”

Those words are the advice of Australia’s then leading diplomat in Jakarta.

The first edition of Blood and Silence will be in English. Whether Kompas will be forced to abandon its promise to publish in Indonesian will be a test of the nation’s tolerance for dissenting views, a pillar of democracy.The views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Pearls and Irritations.

Duncan Graham

Duncan Graham has been a journalist for more than 40 years in print, radio and TV. He is the author of People Next Door (UWA Press). He is now writing for the English language media in Indonesia from within Indonesia. Duncan Graham has an MPhil degree, a Walkley Award, two Human Rights Commission awards and other prizes for his radio, TV and print journalism in Australia. He lives in East Java.

——————————————————————————

Police hunt for shooter in double killing in Papua Highlands 

  News Desk (The Jakarta Post) Jakarta Mon, January 13, 2025 

A former police officer is believed to be the perpetrator, acting on orders from a rogue faction of Papuan separatists.

Police are intensifying security patrols in Yalimo regency, Papua Highlands, following the shooting of two civilians last week, as they seek to stabilize the situation and capture the shooter. “We are […] on the hunt for Aske Mabel, who is suspected to be the shooter,” said Brig. Gen. Faizal Ramadhani, the chief of the police’s Operation Cartenz Peace, in a written statement on Sunday, as reported by tempo.co

“The patrol at the borders of Yalimo regency is also being tightened by checking vehicles entering and exiting [the regency] to prevent other potential threats.” The patrols are focusing on the regency’s Hobkama village in Elelim district, where the shooting took place. The two victims, a 36-year-old and a 33-year-old, were woodworkers from East Luwu, South Sulawesi. They were attacked while cutting logs in the village on Jan. 8.

Witnesses said that in addition to being shot, the two victims had also been slashed by sharp weapons. They died of their wounds. Suspect Aske Mabel is a former police officer, ranked second brigadier, who defected from the police and joined a faction of the West Papua National Liberation Army-Free Papua Movement (TPNPB-OPM) led by Jeffrey Pagawak Boamanak. However, TPNPB-OPM spokesman Sebby Sambom claimed Aske was not part of the OPM. The movement does not consider Jeffrey a member, after he allegedly embezzled Rp 1.9 billion (US$116,643), claiming that the money would be used to purchase weapons. The weapons, the OPM says, never materialized.

Sebby said Jeffrey and Aske had murdered several people in Papua claiming it was for the movement. The latest murder was the sixth incident. “It was the sixth incident in the Yalimo regency area, all were carried out by Aske Mabel on orders from Jeffrey,” Sebby said.

Expert witnesses tell court accounts ‘are clean’ in bribery case against Enembe 

SPECIAL REPORT: By Yamin Kogoya

The Jakarta District Court heard the case of alleged bribery and gratification against suspended Papua governor Lukas Enembe on Monday with evidence from expert witnesses saying that an audit showed records

 to be “clean and accurate”.

The hearing was convened to hear the testimony of three expert witnesses on the allegations against Governor Enembe.

The panel of judges heard the testimony of two experts Dr Muhammad Rullyandi, SH, MH (a constitutional law expert and lecturer at the Faculty of Law of Jayabaya University) and 

Dr Eko Sambodo, SE, MM, Mak, CFrA (an expert in state finance and losses), and the third witness was due to be heard today.

The experts concluded that nine reports provided by the country’s state financial audit board during Enembe’s tenure as a governor did not contain any irregularities, or misreporting.

It was all “clean and accurate” within the framework of regulations and procedures, the witnesses said.

Complied with admin law
According to Dr Rullyandi (Indonesians often have single names), the state financial management complied with administrative law, which was supervised by a state institution known as the Badan 

Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), the State Financial Audit Board.

“The BPK is the final step in the state management process, starting with planning, implementation, and before accountability, it is under supervision,” Dr Rullyandi said.

Among the BPK’s responsibilities were the supervision of procurement and service contracting. When the BPK found criminal elements under its supervision, it reported them to the authorised agency r

equired by law, he said.

Dr Rullyandi said that this was regulated in Article 14 of Law No. 15 of 2004 concerning the Examination of State Financial Management and Responsibility.

Article 14 of Law No.15 of 2004 states:

(1) “IF CRIMINAL ELEMENTS ARE DETECTED DURING THE EXAMINATION, THE BPK SHALL MAKE AN IMMEDIATE REPORT TO THE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES IN ACCORDANCE 

WITH THE APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS”.

Therefore, before the findings could be prosecuted as articles of bribery or gratification, they must first be tested by the BPK, which then reports them to law enforcement agencies.

Administrative rules
That is the correct way of thinking, said the expert witness.

Law enforcement is not permitted to enter the administrative area while it is still in the administrative process. The law states that when administrative law enforcement occurs, law enforcement should not

 enter before the BPK makes recommendations,” Dr Rullyandi continued.

The BPK audit report indicates that there were no criminal indications of financial irregularities during the term of Governor Lukas Enembe in regional financial management, including no alleged irregularities in

 procurement processes for goods and services, which indicates that the principle of legal certainty was met.

According to Dr Rullyandi, initiation of the investigation process into an alleged criminal act of corruption against Governor Lukas Enembe was not based on BPK’s recommendations.

This means, from the beginning of the investigation until it was transferred to the court, investigators ignored Law No. 15 of 2004, especially Article 14. To enforce the law of corruption, relating to criminal norms regulating 

bribery and gratification, administrative law norms must be considered.

This is accomplished by referring to Law No 1 of 2004 concerning the State Rreasury, which states in section weighing letter c that state financial administration law rules must govern state financial management and

 accountability.

According to Dr Rullyandi, there is also a provision in Law No. 15 of 2004 pertaining to the Responsibility of State Financial Inspection and Management, which regulates how state finances are handled and held 

accountable in the fight against criminal corruption.

Abuse of office allegations
“Regarding allegations of abuse of office, Dr Rullyandi said the defendant did not possess the qualifications to abuse his position through bribery and gratification as stated in Articles 11, 12A, and 12B of the Law.

Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001.

It was due to the authority or power associated with Enembe’s position, which allowed him to move in order to do or not do something related to the procurement of goods and services. This was given as a result of or

 caused by something he did or did not do in his position that violated his obligations.

His position as Governor and as user of the budget had been delegated and handed over to the powers of budget users and officials authorised to carry out the procurement committee for goods and services in accordance 

with Article 18 of Law No. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury.

Particularly, anyone signing or certifying documents related to the letter of evidence that is the basis for the expenditure on APBN / APBD is responsible for its content and consequences.

According to Dr Eko Sambodo’s testimony, if a province [such as Papua] had been given nine times the Unqualified Fair Opinion (abbreviated WTP), administratively, all of them had been managed in accordance with 

relevant regulations, accountability, and accounting standards.

“When it comes to managing finances, it has been audited, so there are no regulatory violations,” Dr Sambobo said.

Governor Enembe’s senior lawyer, Professor OC Kaligis, asked the witness whether this opinion of the WTP could be used as evidence, that corruption did not exist in the province.

The witness replied that in auditor terms, corruption was known as irregularities. Deviation causes state losses.

It means that everything has been done according to and within regulations, including governance, compilers, and reports. It also means that expenditures have been proven, clarifications have been made, all of which

 contribute to its final report.

“This is all WTP offers,” said Dr Sambobo. Under the leadership of Governor Enembe, Papua province won the WTP opinion nine times consecutively.

Another expert opinion was due to be heard in court today.

Witness’s testimonies in Court
The court completed hearing witnesses last week (Monday, August 21), who testified to their involvement or knowledge of the alleged bribery, gratification, and corruption scandal.

Out of 184 witnesses, only 17 were brought to court, and only 1 had any connection with Governor Enembe. Sixteen of these witnesses testified as to not have any connection to Enembe.

Only one witness linked to the governor’s name, Prijatono Lakka, a pastor and Enembe’s assistant, who sent Enembe one billion rupiah (NZ$105,000) to cover medical expenses through governor’s personal funds, 

resulting in an array of allegations, his arrest, and the ongoing process.

To date, no witnesses have emerged to provide testimony or evidence concerning all the alleged wrongdoings and misconduct of Lukas.

Although the governor’s health has improved somewhat, his condition is still critical. The governor’s lawyers continues to ask the judge to detain him in the city for medical treatment and to allow medical specialists 

outside of the control of Corruption Eradication Commission (acrynomed KPK) to treat him in a free environment.

However, these requests have not been responded to. Currently, the governor is confined to the prison cells of KPK.

He is secheduled to appear in court next week on Monday to bring the final stages of this protracted legal drama to closure.

Lukas Enembe’s term as Papua’s provincial Governor will end during early September — next week.

Yamin Kogoya is a West Papuan academic who has a Master of Applied Anthropology and Participatory Development from the Australian National University and who contributes to Asia Pacific Report. 

From the Lani tribe in the Papuan Highlands, he is currently living in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

By APR editor –  August 30, 2023

Minister for agriculture gaoled for 10 years on charges of corruption

Jakarta anti-graft court on Thursday sentenced a former agriculture minister to 10 years in prison for extortion and misuse of public funds, raising questions again about outgoing President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s commitment to fight corruption.

Syahrul Yasin Limpo, 69, became the sixth cabinet minister in Jokowi’s two presidential terms to be embroiled in corruption allegations.

Presiding Judge Rianto Adam Pontoh said Syahrul had extorted more than 44 billion rupiah (U.S. $2.75 million) between 2020 and 2023, using the money to buy cars and jewelry, to pay for beauty treatments and family parties or to provide gifts to others.

“The defendant Syahrul Yasin Limpo has been proven legally and convincingly, according to the law, guilty of committing the crime of corruption jointly and continuously,” Rianto ruled.

Court documents said the ex-minister threatened to dismiss his subordinates if they refused to comply with his demand for 20% of the ministry’s budgeted funds, which he used for personal, family and colleagues’ interests.

The judge said the ex-minister had extorted the money through two of his subordinates, Kasdi Subagyono, his secretary general; and Muhammad Hatta, director of the Agricultural Equipment and Machinery directorate. The judge sentenced them to four years each, as well.

While prosecutors had requested a 12-year prison term, the judge issued a more lenient sentence, noting that Syahrul returned some of the money. He also noted the former minister had made a positive contribution in handling the national food crisis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

11 ID-minister2.jpegFormer cabinet minister Syahrul Yasin Limpo (left) looks at supporters during his sentencing in a Jakarta courtroom, July 11, 2024. [Eko Siswono Toyudho/BenarNews]

Syahrul’s lawyer Djamaludidin Koedoeboen said his client had not decided if he would appeal the ruling. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) had named Syahrul as an extortion suspect on Oct. 11, 2023.

After the sentencing, Syahrul apologized to his family, the community and his colleagues in the NasDem Party.

At the start of Syahrul’s trial in February, prosecutor Taufiq Ibnugroho said the former minister appointed trusted people to collect money from his subordinates.

When presenting his case on July 5, Syahrul tearfully claimed to not be very wealthy.

“I am one of the poorest ministers,” he said.

Syahrul’s assets total about 20 billion rupiah (U.S. $1.24 million), according to the government’s state officials wealth report (LHKPN).

Indonesia Corruption Watch researcher Kurnia Ramadhana said he hoped the KPK would continue to develop the case against Syahrul by summoning his family.

“The KPK needs to conduct further investigations. The witness’s statement in the trial that said Syahrul’s family also enjoyed the proceeds of corruption must be taken seriously,” Kurnia told BenarNews.

The case took a bizarre turn in November 2023 when the then-KPK chief,  Firli Bahuri, was suspended – and then fired a month later – after being suspected of demanding bribes from Syahrul in exchange for leniency in the graft case against him.

Firli, a former police general, has also been named a suspect in an extortion case by the Jakarta police.

Investment Minister Lahadalia reported for bribery, extortion over mining permits

CNN Indonesia – March 19, 2024

Jakarta — The Mining Advocacy Network (JATAM) reported Minister of Investment and head of the Investment Coordinating Agency (BKPM), Bahlil Lahadalia, to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) today, Tuesday March 19.

The report is related to the decision to revoke mining permits by Lahadalia that was allegedly ridden with corrupt practices, namely benefiting himself, certain groups and others, and allegedly harming the country’s economy.

“This report is important in order to reveal what patterns are used by state officials, especially Minister Bahlil in relation to the process of revoking permits that have attracted a polemic”, said JATAM Coordinator Melky Nahar at the KPK Red and White Building in Jakarta on Tuesday.

Lahadalia was reported for allegedly receiving gratifications, bribes and committing extortion related to revoking and reissuing mining permits in Indonesia.

Lahadalia has been given the authority and a mandate to do this by President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo since 2021.

Widodo issued Presidential Decree (Keppres) Number 11/2021 on the Investment Acceleration Task Force in which Lahadalia was appointed as the head of the task force to ensure investment realisation and resolve licensing issues as well as tracking down unproductive mining and plantations permits.

In 2022, President Widodo signed Presidential Decree Number 1/2022 on the Land Use and Investment Arrangement Task Force.

Through this decree, Lahadalia was given the power to revoke mining permits, land use rights and forest area concessions, and made it possible to facilitate social organisations, cooperatives and the like to obtain land or concessions.

The climax of this, said Nahar, was in October 2023 when then President Widodo issued Presidential Regulation Number 70/2023 on Land Allocation for Investment Arrangements.

Through this regulation, Lahadalia was given the authority to revoke mining permits, plantation and forest area concessions and could give land use permits to ormas (social or mass organisations), cooperatives and so on.

“JATAM suspects that President Jokowi’s move, which give great authority to Bahlil such that he had the power to revoke thousands of mining permits that was actually full of corruption. The indications of corruption are strengthened by allegations that Minister Bahlil fixed the tariffs or fees for a number of companies that wanted their permits restored”, said Nahar.

JATAM is asking the KPK to follow up on the report of alleged corruption involving Lahadalia.

“JATAM hopes and is urging the KPK to work quickly after this report has been made to connect the facts that have already been revealed to the public so that we can see the whole picture of the puzzle, so that we can see how depraved the alleged corruption was that happened, following this just who the parties were that gained benefits” he said.

KPK Deputy Chairperson Alexander Marwata has ordered the KPK Social Complaints Team (Dumas) to follow up on the report.

“The leadership has asked the Dumas to review the information which has been conveyed by the public”, said Marwata when sought for confirmation via a written message.

Lahadalia meanwhile has declined to respond to the report submitted by JATAM. “I don’t know, I don’t know [about it] yet”, Lahadalia said after making a complaint with the national police Criminal Investigations Directorate. (ryn/fra)

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was “JATAM Laporkan Bahlil Lahadalia ke KPK”.]

Source:

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20240319190659-12-1076318/jatam-laporkan-bahlil-lahadalia-ke-kpk

—————————————————————

A prayer for democratic revival in Indonesia

President Jokowi kick-off the implementation of recommendations for non-judicial settlement of 12 cases of gross human rights violations in the past, at Rumoh Geudong, one of the former Tactical and Strategic Unit Posts (Pos Sattis) in Sector A-Pidie during the implementation of the Military Operations Area ( DOM) in Aceh (1989-1998), located in Gampong Bili Aron, Glumpang Tiga District, Tuesday, 27 June 2023.

The quick count of Indonesia’s recent elections indicates the winner is previously disgraced Prabowo. Accusations abound of voting fraud, vote buying, court-rigging, and corruption within the electoral commission, and many friends are despairing of Indonesia’s retreating democracy. I share that concern, but I can see a potential different interpretation of the facts. My prayer, and an exerted effort by political parties and civil society, Indonesia can revive its democracy in regional elections next November.

Pearls and Irritations published Duncan Graham’s “Indifference Killing Democracy in Indonesia on 11 March, 2024. He presented well-documented sins of Prabowo under President Soeharto. But after Soeharto was forced to resign, Prabowo exiled himself to Jordon. He returned twenty years ago, declaring to be a different person because it was a different era.

Prabowo

In 2008 Prabowo formed Gerindra, his own political party. And in 2009, Megawati accepted this ally of the hated Soeharto as her running mate for the 2009 Presidential elections. They lost.

In 2014 and 2019 he campaigned dirty against Jokowi. After losing a second time, Jokowi appointed him as Minister for Defence. Thus both Megawati and Jokowi had accepted a changed Prabowo.

After a year working for Jokowi, Prabowo confessed that Jokowi was a better leader. Then in 2023 Jokowi supported Prabowo for Presidency in 2024, and it seems Prabowo has won.

On Monday 4 March 2024, less than three weeks after the election, Prabowo declared that Indonesia’s democracy has “a lot of room for improvement”, which he described as “vibrant and resilient”, though he said that democracy is “really very, very tiring; democracy is very, very messy” and “we are still not satisfied with our democracy.” Face value, Prabowo was saying he is pro-democracy but not pro Indonesia’s current democracy.

Prabowo has been supported up to now by his younger brother, businessman Hashim Djojohadikusumo, who has just now been reported as being bankrupt. Will Prabowo now revert to his military style, or to Soeharto’s kleptocracy, to save his brother that helped him get to the top? Or will he act like a convert, and un-mess Indonesia’s democracy?

Jokowi

Had Jokowi been practicing democracy for so long, and now leave such a trail undoing Indonesia’s democracy? Maybe he never was pro-democracy, maybe adept as manager and marketeer where his achievements seemed democratic. But maybe he believes his actions are to democratise Indonesia’s form of democracy?

In his first term he refused to appoint politicians to his cabinet. He avoided parliament (DPR). But in 2016, DPR supported his bill for simultaneous elections of regional leaders after Presidential elections in 2024. Was he laying the foundation for profound change?

Then big news after Jokowi was re-elected in 2019 was his ministerial appointment of Prabowo, his acrimonious rival.

Jokowi has been duplicitous concerning the 2004 undemocratic National System of Development Planning Law (UU SPPN), that requires a long-term development plan every twenty years and five-year development plans drafted before elections, only edited by incoming leaders and valid without amendment for five years. Jokowi’s 2019 five-year plan was 2279 pages long. Jokowi did not make any effort to change this problematic planning system, but he paid little attention to it.

And in 2019, Jokowi produced a vision for Indonesia by 2045, to be the basis for long-term planning in 2025. But he has retained UU SPPN, and demands long-term plans to be prepared in 2024.

The only scenario I can see for maintaining the planning law that Jokowi disdains, is that it is a lever over parties for the regional elections in November for the 550 positions of Governor, Regent and Mayor, to be elected by popular vote. Maybe Jokowi is attempting to reform local democracy.

Parties, all undemocratic, are under pressure in three ways. With too many elections and too many candidates, national party committees and party patrons cannot hold the reigns. They must delegate to their provincial branches.

Campaigns will be based on carefully overseen long term plans for 2025-2045, based on Jokowi’s Indonesia Emas 2045. No more room for candidates to campaign beyond their authority, and candidates mut look to the long term.

And economic outlooks must include collaboration to embrace connectivity within markets. From 2025, Jokowi is demanding decentralise governance of the economy. Political parties within provinces need to prepare collaborative campaigns, not just campaigns between local elites.

In 2019 Jokowi surrounded Prabowo with people who could monitor his faithfulness. Yes, Jokowi seems to be creating a dynasty. Maybe also keeping a watch over Prabowo, like he did in 2019. Could that very same brother-in-law in the constitutional court who helped create the dynasty, also keep close watch over any attempt to undermine the constitution? Will Jokowi demand he appoints opponents Ganjar and Mahfud or even Ahok as ministers, as he appointed Prabowo back in 2019?

Could he be demanding Prabowo oversee better decentralisation, a focus on SDG 2030, a revision of the Planning Law, and political party law to demand parties to be democratic?

Whether Prabowo returns to his old self, or whether my hope and prayer is answered, political parties can start preparing to change local democracy by being more democratic themselves. And local civil societies can be demanding it.

Consider making a donation to support independent journalism

Pearls and Irritations relies totally on donations from its readers. We are independent and we don’t accept financial support from governments, their agencies or vested interests such as fossil fuel and arms manufacturing companies. We do not accept advertising, nor do we have a paywall.

Please consider a donation to help Pearls and Irritations extend its voice and reach.

Owen Podger

Owen Podger is an Australian living in Indonesia. Since March 1998 when Soeharto was elected for the final time, he has concentrated on assisting Indonesian reforms , mainly in two areas: (1) policies to improve performance of government in Indonesia’s new democratic and decentralised system, and (2) sustainable urbanisation considering climate change and disasters.

Survey finds drastic decline in people who think elections were honest and fair

Kompas.com – February 25, 2024

Novianti Setuningsih, Jakarta — The Indonesian Survey Institute (LSI) says that the level of public trust in the honesty and fairness (jurdil) of the 2024 general elections has plummeted a week after the vote on February 14.

This was one of the findings of a post-election survey conducted by the LSI on February 19-21.

In the post-election survey, the number of respondents who believe that the 2024 elections proceeded in an honest and fair manner was only 76.4 percent. Yet on voting day, the figure stood at 94.3 percent.

LSI Executive Director Djayadi Hanan said this sharp decline can be regarded as severe.

“There has been a decline in the level of public confidence in the jurdil (honesty, fairness) of the election process when seen from this data”, said Hanan during an online release of the LSI’s findings on Sunday February 24.

“The decline is almost 20 percent. A decline that is very significant”, he continued.

Broken down, the number of respondents who considered the implementation of the 2024 elections to be “very honest and fair” plummeted from 45.5 percent to 17.6 percent.

This difference does not compensate for the number of respondents who consider the implementation of the elections to be quite honest and fair, which only rose to 58.8 percent from the previous 48.8 percent.

Of the remainder, an additional 8.1 percent of respondents consider the

2024 elections to be less than honest and fair, as well as 4.8 percent of respondents who considered it to be not honest and fair at all.

Furthermore, Hanan revealed that the declining trend was also seen in public satisfaction with the implementation of the 2024 elections.

In the post-election survey, the level of public satisfaction in the elections reached 83.6 percent. Yet on polling day, the level of satisfaction was as high as 94.5 percent.

Hanan believes that this decline is significant because the change in the figures was quite wide in a short space of time.

“So for example, if we did a survey in another 10 days, maybe the level of satisfaction will go down again”, he said.

Hanan is of the view that one of the reasons for the decline was because the public was been informed about the various controversies that accompanied the organisation of the 2024 elections through a variety of news reports.

This includes the controversy over tabulation errors in the General Elections Commission’s (KPU) Recapitulation Information System (Sirekap). Then, there have also been a number of reports doing the rounds about elections being rerun in several regions.

For example, the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) has recommended that 780 polling stations (TPS) must organise a revote, and the KPU has already scheduled 686 of these.

Over the same time span, the number of respondents who answered they were “less than satisfied” with the elections rose from 4.4 to 8.3 percent, and those who were “not satisfied at all” also increased sharply from 0.5 to 5.5 percent.

The LSI said that the survey target population was Indonesian citizens who are 17 years and over or who are married and have a telephone or cellphone. This represents around 83 percent of the total national population.

The sample was selected through a Random Digit Dialing (RDD) method or the technique of selecting a sample through a random telephone number generation process.

Using the RDD technique, a sample of 1,211 respondents was selected through a random telephone number generation process, validation and screening. The survey’s margin of error is estimated to be around 2.9 percent with a 95 percent level of confidence.

The LSI claims that the interviews with respondents that were conducted by telephone were done by trained interviewers.

Politically, the narrative about the lack of honesty and fairness that has irreparably damaged the credibility of the 2024 election is getting stronger.

And this is not just coming from civil society groups. The political parties that supported the loosing presidential tickets of Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar and Ganjar Pranowo-Mahfud MD have begun to be of one voice in the discourse about initiating a parliamentary right of inquiry to raise the issue.

Former Central Java governor Pranowo is already pushing the two political parties that supported him in the election  — the ruling Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) and the United Development Party (PPP) — to use the House of Representative’s (DPR) right of inquiry.

According to Pranowo, the DPR cannot remain silent over the alleged election fraud that was so blatant.

“In this case, the DPR can summon state officials who know about these fraudulent practices, including asking for accountability from the KPU and Bawaslu as the election organisers”, Pranowo said in a statement on February 19.

Meanwhile, the three political parties supporting Baswedan and Iskandar, the National Democrats (Nasdem), the National Awakening Party (PKB) and the Justice and Prosperity Party (PKS) are ready to support a right of inquiry in the DPR.

“We have met and discussed the steps and we are solid, because of this I want to convey, when the right of inquiry initiative is carried out these three parties are ready to participate”, said former Jakarta Governor Baswedan at the Anies-Muhaimin national legal team office in Mampang Prapatan, South Jakarta, on February 20.

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was “Survei LSI: Tingkat Keyakinan Masyarakat Pemilu 2024 Jurdil Turun Drastis Sepekan sejak Pencoblosan”.]

Source: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/02/25/15415871/survei-lsi-tingkat-keyakinan-masyarakat-pemilu-2024-jurdil-turun-drastis

Jokowi’s misuse of social aid during election can be categorised as corruption

Kompas.com – February 27, 2024

Ihsanuddin, Jakarta — It is believed that the misuse of social aid

(bansos) from the government during the 2024 elections can be categorised as corruption.

Indonesian Legal Aid and Human Rights Association (PBHI) Chairperson Julius Ibrani conveyed this during a discussion titled “A Fair and Democratic Indonesia Movement” with the theme “An Election Right of

Inquiry: A Release of 30 Names of DPR Members Being Encouraged to Submit a Right of Inquiry” in Jakarta on Tuesday February 27.

“Including bansos. It must be included in the category of corruption.

Why? Because it benefits certain parties, either personally or as corporate institutions and others”, said Ibrani in his presentation.

He is of the view that the government’s social aid program was a tool to raise the votes for a certain presidential and vice presidential candidate ticket.

As is known, President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo eldest son Gibran Rakabuming Raka ran as a vice presidential candidate in the 2024 presidential election under ticket number 2 as presidential candidate Prabowo Subianto’s running mate.

Ibrani said that the distribution of social aid ahead of voting day in the presidential election (Pilpres) also influenced survey results and the electability of the Prabowo-Gibran ticket.

“This was systemic, indeed the system that was seen was wherever there was a lack of vote for the beloved child he would pour water there”, said Ibrani.

“Until it then affected the results of electoral surveys, surveys, exit polls, why? People didn’t want to answer if they don’t choose Gibran, [they were] afraid of not getting social aid. That’s systemic”, he added.

Not only that, he also believes there are suspicions of the use of the state apparatus in the process to ensure a victory for presidential candidate pair number 2.

Moreover, he also considers that this year’s election process was systematically rotten.

“Also the use of state officials, just to mention a few, the TNI [Indonesian military], the Polri [Indonesian police], village officials, ministries and all kinds of facilities within this which should be categorised as corruption. Because it was used for the benefit of one or two particular parties”, he said.

The disbursement of social aid during the election campaign period this year has been in the public spotlight and was seen to be politically charged.

But despite being in the spotlight, the government still boosted the distribution of social aid and even promised it would continue to distribute social aid until June 2024.

In the realisation of the social aid program, President Widodo even “came from the mountain” to check the distribution of social aid in the Central Java city of Salatiga on Monday January 22.

Widodo said the government would try to continue the distribution of rice social assistance until June 2024 and that he hoped that the state budget (APBN) would remain strong so that social aid could continue.

Aside from Widodo, Coordinating Minister for the Economy Airlangga Hartarto also went into the field to distribute social aid directly and distributed assistance from government rice reserves in Indramayu, West Java, on Wednesday January 24.

Airlangga said that food assistance was intended to accelerate the elimination of extreme poverty in Indonesia. He also gave assurances that the government would continue the El Nino Direct Cash Assistance Program (BLT) which is now still in the disbursement stage.

“Direct cash assistance [to compensate] for El Nino amounting to 200,000 rupiah per month is now in process and it is hoped that at the end of the month or at the beginning of next month it can be launched”, he said.

However Presidential Special Staff Coordinator Ari Dwipayana said that the social aid distributed by the government was not related to the general election process.

Dwipayana asserted that the social aid was assistance for small communities that had already been mutually agreed upon by the government and the House of Representatives (DPR).

“It must be remembered that social aid is an affirmation program from the government for the ordinary people and poor families, the funding for which is sourced from the APBN”, said Dwipayana in a written statement given to journalists on Thursday January 4.

“And it was already agreed to jointly between the government and DPR.

So, it has nothing to do with the election process”, he said.

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was “Penyalahgunaan Bansos Saat Pemilu Dinilai Bisa Masuk Kategori Korupsi”.]

Source:

https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/02/27/17091111/penyalahgunaan-bansos-saat-pemilu-dinilai-bisa-masuk-kategori-korupsi

Indonesia has third highest level of money politics in the world:

Research

CNN Indonesia – November 30, 2023

Jakarta — Jakarta Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University (UIN) political science professor Burhanuddin Muhtadi says that Indonesia is one of the countries with the highest level of money politics in the world.

According to Muhtadi, Indonesia is only outdone by two countries in Africa, namely Uganda and Benin. Muhtadi made this statement during his inauguration speech as professor of political science at the Jakarta UIN on Wednesday November 29.

“This makes Indonesia the country with the third highest level of money politics in the world. Only being outdone by Uganda and Benin”, he said.

Muhtadi said this was revealed from the results of research he conducted during the last two presidential elections in 2014 and 2019. The result was that around 33 percent or 62 million out of a total of 187 million voters included on the permanent voter list (DPT) were involved in the practice of buying and selling votes.

This was also revealed in data from his scientific research project titled “Votes For Sale: Clientelism, Democratic Deficit, and Institution”, which was released during his inauguration.

Muhtadi added that the voters that were mostly targeted were sympathisers of political parties which account for some 15 percent.

Meanwhile the remaining 85 percent were not targeted as they are considered unreliable because they are “floating” or swing voters.

“They are reluctant to target floating voters because they are seen as accepting the packages offered but their electoral choice cannot be guaranteed”, he said.

Muhtadi said that although money politics only contributes to 10 percent of the vote, this number is considered quite effective especially in the context of legislative elections and when competing with fellow candidates from the same party.

“The 10 percent figure can be the determining factor in winning. The average margin of victory to defeat a rival is only 1.6 percent. So, [the figure of 10 percent] can make the differences between a candidate winning or losing”, he said. (thr/bmw)

[Translated by James Balowski. The original title of the article was

“Pakar: Politik Uang di Indonesia Tertinggi Ketiga di Dunia”.]

Candidate profile: Prabowo Subianto 

Published in The Jakarta Post 24/11/23

Prabowo Subianto Djojohadikusumo, 72, is a retired Army lieutenant general, a businessman and the incumbent Defense Minister (2019-present). Due to his proximity to power throughout his military career, he entered politics in 2004 to pursue his dream of becoming the nation’s president.

He cofounded the Gerindra Party in 2008 and as its chairman (2014-present), he made two unsuccessful bids for the presidency in 2014 and 2019. Prabowo accepted his party’s nomination on Aug. 12, 2022 to run for a third time.

 He registered as a presidential candidate on Oct. 25, 2023, with the backing of the Gerindra-led Onward Indonesia Coalition (KIM), which groups several pro-government parties of the ruling coalition. What is his background? Prabowo was born in Jakarta on Oct. 17, 1951, the third of four children to one of the most powerful families in Indonesia. His father, Soemitro Djojohadikusumo, was a prominent economist and politician who held several ministerial posts under presidents Sukarno and Soeharto. His mother, Dona Marie Siregar, was a housewife who studied surgical nursing in the Netherlands.

His grandfather, Margono Djojohadikusumo, was the founder of Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI) and the first head of the Supreme Advisory Council, which was disbanded in 2003. Prabowo spent most of his childhood overseas due to his father’s involvement in the Revolutionary Government of the Republic of Indonesia (PRRI), which was set up in 1958 in opposition to the Sukarno administration. As a result, Prabowo is fluent in French, German, English and Dutch.

 Prabowo joined the military, then called the Indonesian Armed Forces (ABRI), shortly after he graduated from the Armed Forces Academy (AKABRI) in 1974. He served with ABRI for 28 years before he was dishonorably discharged following the collapse of Soeharto’s New Order regime in 1998. He married Soeharto’s daughter Siti Hediati Hariyadi in 1983, but they separated soon after the autocratic president’s ouster. 

The couple have a son, Ragowo “Didit” Hediprasetyo Djojohadikusumo, a fashion designer based in Paris, France. He returned to Indonesia in 2001 from self-exile in Jordan and followed in the footsteps of his businessman brother, Hashim Djojohadikusumo. Prabowo set up pulp and paper company Nusantara Energy and later founded the Nusantara Group, a conglomerate with businesses in the palm oil, coal and gas, mining, agriculture and fishery industries. 

He tried his luck but failed at the Golkar Party national convention in 2004 to select a presidential nominee. Four years later, he cofounded Gerindra and was nominated as the running mate of Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) chair Megawati Soekarnoputri’s presidential bid in 2009, but also lost. He was elected as Gerindra chairman in 2014. What does he stand for? As a member of the ruling class, Prabowo was in a privileged position to pursue his dreams.

 He had an illustrious military career before it came to an abrupt end in 1998. Just two years after he joined the Army, Prabowo was recruited into the Sandhi Yudha division of Kopassandha (Special Forces Command), the precursor to the Army’s Special Forces (Kopassus). He was sent to then-East Timor in 1976 to quell the secessionist movement there. Prabowo became commander to the airborne infantry battalion of the Army Strategic Reserves Command (Kostrad) in 1987 after completing a Special Forces Officer Course at Fort Benning in the United States. 

He returned to the Army’s special forces in 1993 to lead a unit running clandestine operations and eventually became Kopassus general commander in 1996. In March 1998, Prabowo was appointed as Kostrad commander, a position previously held by Soeharto, his former father-in-law.

Prabowo was removed from this position soon after Soeharto stepped down in May 1998 and vice president BJ Habibie was elevated to the presidency, due to an alleged attempt to launch a coup without the knowledge of ABRI chief Wiranto. In July 1998, ABRI formed an Officers Ethics Council (DKP) to investigate Prabowo. 

The DKP eventually decided to dishonorably discharge Prabowo due to a number of actions he carried out, which the council deemed demonstrated his insubordination and disregard for the military code. He and other members of Kopassus were banned from traveling to the US over the alleged human rights abuses they committed against the people of Timor-Leste. 

This ban lasted until 2022, when it was effectively lifted so Prabowo could visit the US as Indonesia’s defense minister. During his 2019 presidential campaign, Prabowo courted the support of some hard-line Muslim groups against the reelection bid of President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, who was seen as a pluralist leader. 

The strategy resulted in a highly polarizing election that divided the Indonesian public and led to the post-election riots in Jakarta, in which at least eight people were killed and hundreds injured in clashes with police. What does he bring to the table? Prabowo is the wealthiest of all the 2024 presidential candidates. As of March 31, 2023, he is valued at over Rp 2 trillion (US$ 128 million). Prabowo has proven his resilience in national politics. After losing in the last round of the 2004 Golkar convention to his former commander Wiranto, 

Prabowo set up Gerindra with his brother, former student activist Fadli Zon and former State Intelligence Agency (BIN) deputy Muchdi Purwoprandjono. As running mate to former president Megawati in her 2009 election bid, the pair lost to incumbent Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who was on the DKP when it issued Prabowo’s dishonorable discharge. Despite the loss in 2009, Prabowo’s rising popularity helped propel Gerinda’s electability within a relatively short time. 

The party secured 11.81 percent of total votes in the 2014 general election to come in third, behind the PDI-P and Golkar. In the 2014 election, Prabowo lost to then-Jakarta governor Jokowi with a margin of 6.35 percentage points. He filed an unsuccessful lawsuit with the Constitutional Court alleging “massive and systemic” election fraud, which was dismissed. He tried to make another bid for the presidency in 2019, with then-Jakarta deputy governor Sandiaga Uno as his running mate, and lost with a margin of 11 points. Prabowo supporters took to the city’s streets to protest the election result, which turned violent. He again filed a lawsuit with the court alleging widespread vote rigging, but his claim was again rejected.

 Following the bitterly contested election, Jokowi offered Prabowo the post of defense minister in an effort to bring Gerindra into the cabinet: The party had secured 12.5 percent of votes to become the second largest party in the country. Prabowo took the offer and subsequently buried the hatchet with Jokowi, reinventing himself and basking in the coattail-effect of supporting the President. But he still cuts a polarizing figure because of his military record.

 Prabowo was reportedly sent back to East Timor in 1983, during which he was allegedly involved in the Kraras massacre, although he has repeatedly denied this. As Kopassus commander, Prabowo was allegedly involved in the forced disappearances of pro-democracy activists between 1997 and 1998 amid growing resistance to the Soeharto regime. 

He has denied the allegations, but his subordinates at the time were convicted and sentenced to prison. Prabowo also has been accused of engineering the May 1998 riots in Jakarta and several other large cities, allegedly in an attempt to urge the Soeharto regime to declare martial law. No legal actions have been taken against Prabowo over this allegation.